文章摘要
“小同行”审稿专家精准选择实践探索 ——以《华南农业大学学报》为例
Practical exploration of “small peer” reviewer accurate selection: Taking Journal of South China Agricultural University as an example
投稿时间:2024-03-28  修订日期:2024-07-22
DOI:
中文关键词: 专家外审  同行评议  学科发展  小同行
英文关键词: expert external review  peer review  discipline development  small peer
基金项目:广东省科技计划项目(2021B1212020018);中国农业期刊网研究基金(CAJW2023-022);广东省高校学报研究会项目(20220303)
作者单位邮编
李庆玲* 华南农业大学学报编辑部 510642
谢文亮 广东财经大学期刊中心 
周志红 华南农业大学学报编辑部 
龚紫钰 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》编辑部 
摘要点击次数: 7
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      《华南农业大学学报》近6年在专家外审环节存在专家审稿意愿不强,审稿压力分布不均衡、专家库数据陈旧,专家来源区域多样化不足,年轻专家比例较低等瓶颈。编辑结合学科发展提出精准选择“小同行”送审的创新性突破策略,如关注学科发展,充分挖掘各种学术资源,借重大事件和高水平作者拓展高水平审稿专家,发动青年科学家审阅前沿、交叉学科和时效性强稿件。经过集中实践,专家审稿意愿增强、审稿压力更加均衡,专家来源区域多样化、队伍年轻化,期刊与高水平专家的辐射效应增强,编辑学科素养提升、工作思路更加开阔。
英文摘要:
      In the past 6 years, Journal of South China Agricultural University had some bottlenecks in the expert external review process, such as the review willingness of experts was not strong, the distribution of review pressure was unbalanced and the data of expert database was outdated, the source regions of experts were not diverse enough, the proportion of young experts was low. Combined with the development of the disciplines, the editor proposed innovative breakthrough strategies for accurately selecting “small peer” reviewers, such as paying attention to the development of disciplines, making full use of various academic resources, expanding high-level experts with the help of importrant events and high-level authors, engaging young scientists to review cutting-edge, interdisciplinary and timely manuscripts. Through the concentrated practice of the countermeasures, the review willingness of experts is enhanced, the distritution of review pressure is more balanced,the source regions of experts are diversified, the reviewer team is younger, the radiation effect between journals and high-level reviewers is enhanced, the discipline quality of editors is improved and the work ideas are more open.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭