|
| 基于撤稿案例的科技伦理违规特征挖掘与审稿操作指引 |
| Mining Ethical Violation Characteristics Based on Retraction Cases and Development of Review Guidelines |
| 投稿时间：2026-03-05 修订日期：2026-08-08 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 科技伦理 撤稿 违规特征 审稿操作指引 |
| 英文关键词: scientific journals technology ethics retraction violation characteristics review guidelines |
| 基金项目:中国高校科技期刊研究会—Contrimetric期刊影响力提升(CUJS-GJHZ-JN-2025-05)；江苏省科技期刊学会暨长三角科技期刊·MPS/AJE英文期刊发展基金(JSKJQK-MPS/AJE-2025-002)；2025年度中国科技期刊卓越行动计划高水平办刊人才培育项目-科技期刊办刊人才主题荟活动-青编荟(新技术、新工具赋能科技期刊发展)；南京农业大学中央高校基本科研业务费(QKYJ2025001)。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 188 |
| 全文下载次数: 44 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 本研究对标国家科技伦理审查办法,筛选撤稿观察数据库中由于科技伦理问题而引发的撤稿记录,系统揭示了科技伦理撤稿原因的交叉共现情况及在不同学科间的风险聚集差异,并基于深度案例解析,提炼出17项违规特征,并据此编制形成贯穿初审、外审、终审全流程,包含显性特征核查与隐性特征甄别两个层级的审稿操作指引,为科技期刊实现科技伦理风险的全流程精准防控提供了系统化审稿操作参考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| This study, aligning with the national measures for technology ethics review, screened retraction records in the Retraction Watch Database attributed to technology ethics issues. It systematically reveals the co-occurrence of reasons for retractions due to technology ethics violations and the variations in risk aggregation across different disciplines. Through in-depth case analysis, 17 violation characteristics were identified, leading to the development of a two-tiered review operation guideline. This guideline encompasses explicit feature verification and implicit feature identification throughout the entire process, including initial review, peer review, and final decision. It provides systematic review operation references for scientific journals to achieve precise, end-to-end prevention and control of technology ethics risks. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
