文章摘要
郑美玲,杨莉丽,舒强,李民驹.学术论文双盲评审的优势与可行性.编辑学报,2008,20(6):551-553
学术论文双盲评审的优势与可行性
Advantages and feasibility of double-blind peer-review for research articles
投稿时间:2008-04-05  修订日期:2008-04-05
DOI:
中文关键词: 同行评审  单盲评审  双盲评审  开放评审
英文关键词: peer-review  single-blind review  double-blind review  open review
基金项目:
作者单位
郑美玲 浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院WJP编辑部,310003,杭州 
杨莉丽 浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院WJP编辑部,310003,杭州 
舒强 浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院WJP编辑部,310003,杭州 
李民驹 浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院WJP编辑部,310003,杭州 
摘要点击次数: 743
全文下载次数: 761
中文摘要:
      就双盲评审与其他2种方式作对比,阐述其优势和可行性。单盲评审的不平衡,容易导致审稿人责任的缺失以及个人偏见导致的不公正判断。开放评审相对公开透明,被国外一些期刊所尝试,但其还不成熟,不适应国内当前的实际情况,不能被广泛推广。双盲评审能弥补单盲的缺陷,保证审稿更加客观公正,受到多数研究人员的认可,并且有利于提高审稿质量,提高期刊的被引用率。在采用双盲评审方式时,编辑人员应发挥良好的桥梁作用。
英文摘要:
      The merits of the double-blind form over the other two forms are emphasized in this paper. Single-blind peer-review is unbalanced in form, and is apt to result in lack of accountability of the referees and unfair judgment caused by personal bias. Open peer review is transparent, but it has not been mature enough to be widely adopted, especially in the present China. Double-blind peer-review is more objective and fairer compared with the single-blind form. It is favored by most researchers, and has the potential of improving the review quality and journal citation. Editors should fully recognize the double-blind form so as to play active and effective roles in the review process.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭