| 关卫屏,游苏宁.《中华儿科杂志》未被引文章分析.编辑学报,2008,20(6):560-562 |
| 《中华儿科杂志》未被引文章分析 |
| Analyses on non-citation of articles published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics |
| 投稿时间：2008-04-19 修订日期：2008-04-19 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 未被引文章 《中华儿科杂志》 医学期刊 |
| 英文关键词: non-cited articles Chinese Journal of Pediatrics medical journal |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 811 |
| 全文下载次数: 795 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 将《中华儿科杂志》2005年全年发表的353篇论文逐一在清华同方引文数据库检索(检索日期截至2007年10月7日),其中40.5%的文章从未被引用过。诊断标准类文章均被引用,是刊载文章中唯一100%被引用的栏目；论著类文章未被引比例较低(15.4%)；15篇述评、专论类文章中4篇未被引用(26.7%),其中2篇外籍专家述评稿件均未被引用；病例报告、临床病例讨论、临床经验交流栏目文章未被引用率分别为87.0%、80.0%、29.3%；答疑、争鸣、讨论类文章未被引比例较高(80.0%)。通过对未被引文章的深入剖析,旨在为国内医学期刊编辑工作实践提供依据。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| All of the 353 articles published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics in 2005 were searched using Tsinghua Tongfang Citation Database by 7th October of 2007. Among these articles 40.5% had not yet been cited. Standard of Diagnosis was the only column that all articles had been cited. Level of non-citation of original articles was very low (15.4%). Of all reviews and special articles only four had not been cited (26.7%), including two foreign experts'. Non-citation rate of Case Report, Clinical Case (Pathological) Discussion and Clinical Experience was 87.0%, 80.0% and 29.3%. Articles of Opinion/Debate/Discussion column were seldom cited and non-citation rate was 80.0%. These analyses provide a reference for the editing work of domestic medical journals. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
