| 朱大明.基金论文与非基金论文作者自引对比分析.编辑学报,2009,21(3):274-275 |
| 基金论文与非基金论文作者自引对比分析 |
| Comparative analysis on author self-citation of foundation-papers and non-foundation-papers |
| 投稿时间：2008-07-21 修订日期：2008-07-21 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 作者自引 基金论文 非基金论文 相关性 |
| 英文关键词: author self-citation foundation-paper non-foundation-paper correlation |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1733 |
| 全文下载次数: 1684 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为探讨作者自引的规律和相对合理性,为期刊编辑、期刊评价和文献计量分析提供参考依据,对基金论文与非基金论文作者自引量进行随机抽样统计分析。结果表明:基金论文的自引篇率和自引率明显高于非基金论文；作者自引量与期刊论文质量存在一定的正相关性。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In order to study the laws and rationality of author self-citation, this paper analyzes the author self-citation quantity of foundation-papers and non-foundation-papers based on random sampling statistics. The results of comparative analysis show that the author self-citation quantity of foundation-papers is higher than that of non-foundation-papers. There is a positive correlation between quantity of author self-citation and quality of periodical paper. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
