| 陈瑞芳.不同医学高校学报英文参考文献的比较与分析.编辑学报,2009,21(4):312-313 |
| 不同医学高校学报英文参考文献的比较与分析 |
| Comparison of English references from journals of different medical colleges and universities |
| 投稿时间：2009-03-12 修订日期：2009-03-12 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 医学高校学报 参考文献 差错 比较 |
| 英文关键词: journals of medical colleges and universities reference error comparison |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 967 |
| 全文下载次数: 760 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 选择3组每组6种医学高校学报:MEDLINE收录的医科大学学报,医科大学学报和地方医学院学报,每种选2008年任一期中的10条英文参考文献进行核查。结果发现:共有67条文献存在差错,3组学报的差错分别为17、19和31条。差错构成的前3位为作者姓名28处(29%),文章题名27处(28%),期刊名称18处(19%)。建议:1)在编辑环节到数据库对每条文献进行检索核对；2)在初审环节抽查参考文献是否存在差错,若有差错,返回作者对每条文献进行核查；3)在作者投递稿件时让作者提供检索记录。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Sampled journals of medical colleges and universities were divided into 3 groups:MEDLINE covered university journals, other medical university journals, journals of medical colleges. Six kinds of journals were chosen in each group. Ten English references were randomly selected from each article published in these journals in 2008. It was found that 67 errors existed in the 180 English references. The errors in the three groups were 17,9 and 31, respectively. Errors in the composition of the first three were the author names 28 (29%), article titles 27 (28%), journal titles 18 (19%). We suggest that, 1) every item of English references must be examined in editing process; 2) Some references must be checked randomly when receiving the authors' contributions, and the manuscripts should be returned to the authors if errors found; 3) The record retrieval is suggested to be provided when the authors submit their articles. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
