| 孔琪颖,蔡斐,张利平,徐晓.正确看待“科技期刊学术不端文献检测系统”检测结果.编辑学报,2009,21(6):544-546 |
| 正确看待“科技期刊学术不端文献检测系统”检测结果 |
| Analysis of AMLC check results |
| 投稿时间：2009-03-16 修订日期：2009-03-16 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 学术不端文献检测系统 初审 编辑 |
| 英文关键词: AMLC initial review editor |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 994 |
| 全文下载次数: 894 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 归纳影响“科技期刊学术不端文献检测系统”检测结果的要素,对初审中运用该系统检测出的不同等级文字复制比的文章的学术不端可能性进行了分析。结合实际检测案例,得出该系统能有效帮助初审,但尚不能取代初审的结论。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Main factors that affect the results of Academic Misconduct Literature Check (AMLC) are summarized. Then, whether a manuscript has piratical content, and which types of plagiarism the manuscript may have are analyzed combining with the editors' initial review experience. Analyses show that the AMLC can really facilitate the initial review by the editorial office, but AMLC check results can not replace the initial review. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
