| 赵丽莹,杨波,张荣丽,王小唯.对专家审稿的分析和思考.编辑学报,2010,22(2):146-148 |
| 对专家审稿的分析和思考 |
| Analysis and reflection of peer review |
| 投稿时间：2009-11-26 修订日期：2009-11-26 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 高校学报 专家审稿 A类意见 审回率 |
| 英文关键词: university journal peer review reviewers' opinions belonging to level A return rate of peer view |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 933 |
| 全文下载次数: 755 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为了研究专家审稿的规律和特征,对2008年度《哈尔滨工业大学学报》96篇论文的195次送审情况进行统计分析。结果表明:副教授的审回率和A类意见率都高于教授；40岁以下专家审回率和A类意见率最高,40～44岁的专家次之,45～54岁的专家审回率和A类意见率低,65岁以上专家审回率不高,但是一旦审稿就会比较认真,而且返回迅速；学术氛围浓厚的著名学府的专家在审稿方面更有责任感和奉献精神；工作繁忙是专家不审稿和审稿不认真的一个主要原因。建议高校学报大胆选用青年审稿专家,不断优化审稿专家数据库,与审稿专家建立良好的合作关系。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In order to study the laws and characteristics of peer review, statistical analysis on 195 submissions for approval or revision of 96 papers on Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology in the year of 2008 was conducted. Results indicate that the return rate of peer review by associate professors is much higher than that by professors, and the ratio of the number of reviewers' opinions belonging to level A to that of all reviewers' opinions by associate professors is also higher than that by professors. The most efficient peer review is performed by reviewers below 40 years old, the efficiency is lower for reviewers during 40-44 years old, and it is the lowest for 45-54 year-old reviewers. The return rate of peer review by reviewers over 65 years old is not high, but these reviewers are usually more careful and the review is in a fast return. The reviewers in universities with good scientific atmosphere are more responsible for the examination. The main reason for reviewers to refuse the peer review or perform it carelessly is their busy work. It is suggested that young reviewers should be chosen for the peer review reasonably. The database of reviewers should be optimized constantly, and a good relationship with reviewers should be set up. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
