文章摘要
刘荣军.从信息博弈看科技学术期刊的审稿策略.编辑学报,2010,22(3):192-194
从信息博弈看科技学术期刊的审稿策略
Tactics of manuscript examination for sci-tech academic journals based on information game theory
投稿时间:2010-01-16  修订日期:2010-01-16
DOI:
中文关键词: 科技学术期刊  信息博弈  信号识别  审稿策略
英文关键词: sci-tech academic journal  information game  signal recognition  tactics of manuscript examination
基金项目:
作者单位
刘荣军 西南大学学报编辑部,400715,重庆 
摘要点击次数: 1259
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      从信息博弈角度看,为了应对关系稿与审稿人的道德风险问题,科技学术期刊分别采取了“编辑学者化”与“信号识别”的审稿策略;但是,由此产生的“信号异化”及其所带来的“学术寻租”与“逆向选择”问题,使得科技学术期刊必须坚持“把科技学术期刊当作学术期刊来办”和“把专家审稿与编辑审稿相结合”的审稿策略。
英文摘要:
      In terms of information game, sci-tech academic journals have adopted some general tactics of manuscript examination such as "scholarly editors" and "signal recognition" to deal with the moral hazard of relation contribution and peer reviewing. However, to tackle the resulting "signal alienation" and the consequent "academic rent-seeking" and "adverse selection", sci-tech academic journals must adhere to some basic principles of manuscript examination such as "sci-tech academic journals for sci-tech academic sake" and "combining peer reviewing with editor examination".
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭