| 王福军,冷怀明,郭建秀.对某课题组所发表系列论文中“假引”现象的思考.编辑学报,2011,23(4):308-310 |
| 对某课题组所发表系列论文中“假引”现象的思考 |
| Thoughts on "false citations" among a series of published articles by a research group |
| 投稿时间：2011-01-11 修订日期：2011-01-11 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 假引 期刊影响因子 单篇论文 学术质量 应对措施 |
| 英文关键词: false citation impact factor of periodical single article academic quality measure |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1009 |
| 全文下载次数: 830 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 通过对某课题组所发表系列论文中“假引”现象的分析,阐述以期刊影响因子作为单篇论文学术质量评价指标的局限性及正确认识“假引”现象对单篇论文学术质量评价的意义。认为对于单篇论文应运用期刊影响因子、总被引频次并结合同行评议及论文的社会价值等进行综合评价,并应采取相应的措施减少甚至杜绝“假引”问题。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Through analyzing some "false citations" among a series of articles published by a research group, we elaborates the limitations of impact factor as it has been used to evaluate the academic quality of a single article, and identify the role of "false citation" in this evaluation. We advocate that we need to make a comprehensive analysis to evaluate the academic quality of a single article, including impact factor, total citation of the journal, comments from peer reviewers, and its social values. We hope that we should understand the role of impact factor in evaluating academic quality of a single article, and thus take some measures to reduce and even to put an end of false citation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
