文章摘要
汪挺,阮星星,刘昱菡,陈小宇.医学期刊编辑的伦理要求——对国际编辑伦理标准的思考与补充.编辑学报,2012,24(1):100-102
医学期刊编辑的伦理要求——对国际编辑伦理标准的思考与补充
Ethical responsibilities of medical periodical editors:consideration and complement on the Academy of Management's Code of Ethics (2006)
投稿时间:2011-08-22  修订日期:2011-08-22
DOI:
中文关键词: 编辑  伦理  医学期刊
英文关键词: editor  ethics  medical periodical
基金项目:
作者单位
汪挺 《中华胃肠外科杂志》编辑部,510655 
阮星星 《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志》电子版编辑部,510630:广州 
刘昱菡 《中华胃肠外科杂志》编辑部,510655 
陈小宇 《中华胃肠外科杂志》编辑部,510655 
摘要点击次数: 995
全文下载次数: 797
中文摘要:
      结合2006年管理学会颁布的编辑伦理标准和我国医学编辑经常遇到的伦理问题,对医学期刊编辑的伦理要求进行了剖析。编辑工作的伦理标准包括:公正对待每一篇稿件,不能带有个人恩怨和意识偏见;保证审稿过程的机密性和审稿者的匿名权;及时送审每一篇稿件,对已录用的稿件无特殊原因必须发表;合理的初审直接退稿;选择恰当的审稿者;尽量避免HARKing现象的出现;确保研究方法的有效性;敢于纠正学术歪风;平衡学科发展与杂志发展的关系,以推动医学发展为首要目标。
英文摘要:
      Based on the Academy of Management's Code of Ethics (2006) and ethical issues faced by editors of Chinese medical periodicals, this paper discusses the ethical responsibilities of editors, which include being fair to all academic manuscripts without personal or ideological judgments, ensuring the confidentiality of review process and the anonymity of reviewers, assuring timely review of manuscripts, publishing accepted manuscripts unless major errors or ethical violations take place, desk-rejecting reasonably, assigning proper reviewers, refraining from promotion of HARKing, drawing up valid research methods , having the courage to correct adverse academic atmosphere and admit their own errors, balancing medical science development and journal improvement, and promoting medical science development as our top priority.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭