文章摘要
郑洁,张苹,吕赛英,游滨,王维朗.环境类论文学术不端现象分析及编辑的应对策略.编辑学报,2012,24(2):128-130
环境类论文学术不端现象分析及编辑的应对策略
Analysis of academic misconducts of environmental papers and editors' corresponding measures
投稿时间:2009-03-16  修订日期:2009-03-16
DOI:
中文关键词: 学术不端行为  AMLC  环境类稿件  应对策略
英文关键词: academic misconduct  AMLC  environmental paper  form of misconduct  repetition part  limitation  measures
基金项目:
作者单位
郑洁 重庆大学期刊社,400044,重庆 
张苹 重庆大学期刊社,400044,重庆 
吕赛英 重庆大学期刊社,400044,重庆 
游滨 重庆大学期刊社,400044,重庆 
王维朗 重庆大学期刊社,400044,重庆 
摘要点击次数: 945
全文下载次数: 734
中文摘要:
      利用AMLC对《重庆大学学报》自2010年6月至2011年5月收到的163篇环境类论文进行检测,发现文字重复率≥5%的稿件有52篇,文字相似比集中在5%~40%。逐篇分析发现:有29篇存在学术不端行为,主要表现为引而不注和拆分论文;文字相似比较高部分通常为引言和结果分析与讨论,而环境工程应用案例因其特殊性而被抄袭的概率较小。指出AMLC检测的局限及特点,并有针对性地给出了编辑可采取的对策。
英文摘要:
      Academic Misconduct Literature Check (AMLC) is used to check 163 environmental papers contributed to Journal of Chongqing University from 1 June 2010 to 31 May 2011. It is found that 52 papers repeat sentences or paragraphs of other articles to some extent with a repetition ratio ranging from 5%-40%. By analyzing the results one by one, it is found that 29 papers have academic misconducts, mainly including plagiarism and paper separation; high repetition parts appear usually in sections of introduction and results analysis and discussion, while environmental application cases are not much likely to be plagiarized due to their uniqueness. AMLC's limitations are also analyzed, and measures to improve AMLC's weakness are suggested.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭