| 史锐.退稿处理中编辑的主观能动性与人文素质.编辑学报,2012,24(2):192-193 |
| 退稿处理中编辑的主观能动性与人文素质 |
| Subjective initiatives and humanistic quality of editors in processing manuscript rejections |
| 投稿时间：2011-10-15 修订日期：2011-10-15 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 退稿 编辑的主观能动性 编辑的人文素质 |
| 英文关键词: sci-tech periodical manuscript rejection editor's subjective initiative editor's humanistic quality |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 869 |
| 全文下载次数: 799 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 针对科技期刊退稿率较高的现状,简述4种退稿原因,即内容不符合刊物的报道方向,专家审阅认为达不到发表水平,编委会审阅认为不宜发表,一稿多投等学术不端行为。针对不同原因探讨退稿工作的特征,认为编辑要充分发挥主观能动性,时时尊重与服务作者,公正、灵活处理退稿,使作者虽退稿但不退心。编辑需要具备较高的科学素养和人文素养,这是科技期刊获得长足发展的重要保证之一。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Focusing on the currently high rate of manuscript rejection in sci-tech periodicals, four reasons of the rejection are analyzed. The reasons are as follows:1) the content of the manuscript is not in the scope of the periodical, 2) the quality of the manuscript cannot reach peer-reviewers' requirements for publication, 3) the final audition from the editorial board does not support the manuscript to be published, and 4) the author's academic misconducts such as duplicate submissions of the manuscript. From the view of a journal editor, the characteristics of the above four reasons are explored, highlighting the editor's subjective initiatives and humanistic quality, which is very important to the manuscript contributors. Attitudes of respect and service should be kept in mind for an editor to process the manuscript rejection with impartiality and flexibility. Subjective initiatives and humanistic quality are essential requirements for an editor to ensure the long-term growth of a periodical. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
