| 王琳.特征因子与影响因子及总被引频次的指标特性比较 ——基于“TOP期刊群”样本的实例分析.编辑学报,2013,25(2):200-204 |
| 特征因子与影响因子及总被引频次的指标特性比较 ——基于“TOP期刊群”样本的实例分析 |
| Comparisons of Eigenfactor, Impact Factor and Total Cites by Example Analysis of SCI TOP Journals |
| 投稿时间：2009-03-01 修订日期：2009-03-01 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 评价指标 特征因子 影响因子 总被引频次 实例分析 |
| 英文关键词: evaluation index Eigenfactor impact factor total cites example analysis |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 989 |
| 全文下载次数: 1242 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 通过特征因子与影响因子及总被引频次的指标比较分析和实例佐证,发现特征因子在跨学科评价方面的优势较突出。对我国的优秀期刊进行特征因子指标分析,得到了与常规影响因子不同的结论:1)我国一流期刊实际的学术影响力远低于国际一流期刊的影响力；2)相对于其他学科,我国物理和化学学科期刊在国际上的学术影响力较大,在影响因子排名处于劣势的我国数学类期刊,在国际上也具有一定的影响力。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Through the comparisons and example analysis of Eigenfactor, Impact Factor and Total Cites, it is found that Eigenfactor is more prominent in interdisciplinary evaluation than the other two indexes. And Eigenfactor analysis for our country's outstanding journals indicates different conclusions from that were obtained by conventional Impact Factor analysis:1) Chinese leading journals' academic influence is far lower than the influence of the first-class journals in the world. 2) Chinese physics and chemistry journals have greater international academic influence relative to those journals in other disciplines. Moreover, Chinese mathematical journals which represent poor in the impact factor ranking also have a certain influence in the international academic community. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
