| 周沫,王维朗.科技期刊同行评审专家与编辑的博弈.编辑学报,2013,25(3):214-215 |
| 科技期刊同行评审专家与编辑的博弈 |
| Relationship between peer-reviewer and editor in the peer review process of sci-tech journals |
| 投稿时间：2012-11-01 修订日期：2012-11-01 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 同行评议 评审专家 编辑 |
| 英文关键词: sci-tech journal peer review peer-reviewer editor |
| 基金项目:中国高校科技期刊研究会基金重点资助项目(GBJXA1001) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1005 |
| 全文下载次数: 1162 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为了正确认识评审专家与编辑的关系,提升科技期刊的学术质量,通过对评审专家与编辑在同行评议中作用的分析,阐述评审专家与编辑的博弈关系。认为:审稿专家与编辑之间是合作不是替代,是制约不是对立,两者在博弈中的合作与制约可有效发挥同行评议的作用,最终提高科技期刊质量。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| To correctly understand the relationship between peer-reviewer and editor, and improve the academic quality of sci-tech journals, this article analyzes the roles of peer-reviewer and editor in the peer review process, and elaborates the game relationship between them. It is thought that the relationship between peer-reviewer and editor is cooperation rather than substitution, is restraint but not opposition, and the game between the peer-reviewer and editor could make peer-review more effective,and improve the quality of sci-tech journals. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
