文章摘要
周沫,王维朗.科技期刊同行评审专家与编辑的博弈.编辑学报,2013,25(3):214-215
科技期刊同行评审专家与编辑的博弈
Relationship between peer-reviewer and editor in the peer review process of sci-tech journals
投稿时间:2012-11-01  修订日期:2012-11-01
DOI:
中文关键词: 科技期刊  同行评议  评审专家  编辑
英文关键词: sci-tech journal  peer review  peer-reviewer  editor
基金项目:中国高校科技期刊研究会基金重点资助项目(GBJXA1001)
作者单位
周沫 重庆大学期刊社,400030,重庆 
王维朗 重庆大学期刊社,400030,重庆 
摘要点击次数: 835
全文下载次数: 560
中文摘要:
      为了正确认识评审专家与编辑的关系,提升科技期刊的学术质量,通过对评审专家与编辑在同行评议中作用的分析,阐述评审专家与编辑的博弈关系。认为:审稿专家与编辑之间是合作不是替代,是制约不是对立,两者在博弈中的合作与制约可有效发挥同行评议的作用,最终提高科技期刊质量。
英文摘要:
      To correctly understand the relationship between peer-reviewer and editor, and improve the academic quality of sci-tech journals, this article analyzes the roles of peer-reviewer and editor in the peer review process, and elaborates the game relationship between them. It is thought that the relationship between peer-reviewer and editor is cooperation rather than substitution, is restraint but not opposition, and the game between the peer-reviewer and editor could make peer-review more effective,and improve the quality of sci-tech journals.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭