文章摘要
刘明寿,戴国俊.中国高校学报“垃圾论”辨析——基于农业高校与非高校学术期刊影响力的比较.编辑学报,2013,25(3):279-282
中国高校学报“垃圾论”辨析——基于农业高校与非高校学术期刊影响力的比较
Are Chinese university journals junk?
投稿时间:2011-12-09  修订日期:2011-12-09
DOI:
中文关键词: 农业学术期刊  高校  研究所  总被引频次  影响因子  他引影响因子  基金论文比
英文关键词: academic journal of agriculture  university  institute  total citation frequency  impact factor  non-self-citing impact factor  ratio of funded papers
基金项目:
作者单位
刘明寿 扬州大学学报编辑部,江苏扬州 
戴国俊 扬州大学动物科学学院:225009,江苏扬州 
摘要点击次数: 848
全文下载次数: 566
中文摘要:
      通过分析我国农业高校学报与研究院所、学会主办学术期刊之间的差别,论证高校学报并非垃圾产品。将农业类学术期刊分为省属高校类、省级学会类和国家级学会类3种不同类型,综合分析比较3种不同类型农业类期刊在影响因子、基金论文比等5项指标上的差异。统计结果表明:国家级学会学术期刊总被引频次、影响因子、他引影响因子、基金论文比4个指标极显著地高于省级学会学术期刊(P<0.01);省属高校学报的影响因子、他引影响因子、基金论文也极显著地高于省级学会学术期刊(P<0.01),而且基金论文比、他引总引比略高于国家级学会学术期刊,差异不显著(P>0.05)。综合分析表明:国家级学会学术期刊的大部分指标高于省属高校学报,而省属高校学报均高于省级学会学术期刊,部分指标接近国家级学会学术期刊;近3年,农业类学术期刊总体上的各项评价指标正在逐年提高,农业高校学术期刊的综合影响力较高。
英文摘要:
      The objective of this article is to argue against the viewpoint of "Chinese university journals are junk", based on analysis of the difference between the academic journals published by agricultural universities and non-university institutions. The academic journals on agricultural sciences were divided into three different classes according to the publishers:provincial universities, provincial and national academic societies. Then five indexes of agricultural journals, including impact factor and ratio of funded papers, were compared for journals of the three classes. Statistical analysis showed that:all four indexes, i.e., total citation frequency, impact factor, non-self-citing impact factor and ratio of funded papers, of the academic journals published by national societies, were significantly higher than those of the journals by provincial societies (P < 0.01). Impact factor, ratio of funded papers, and non-self-citing impact factor of the journals of provincial universities were significantly higher than those of the provincial society journals (P< 0.01). Furthermore, ratio of funded papers and ratio of cited papers to total citations were slightly higher than those of national society journals, but the difference was not significant (P> 0.05). These results indicated that most indexes of provincial university journals were close to those of national society journals but higher than those of provincial society journals. The indexes of journals of agricultural sciences increased apparently in recent three years and comprehensive influence of agricultural university journals is getting higher.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭