| 孙宪民,邱宇红,郭海强,孔繁学.从医学院校论文产出状况分析高校科技期刊的功能与定位.编辑学报,2013,25(6):604-606 |
| 从医学院校论文产出状况分析高校科技期刊的功能与定位 |
| The function and orientation of university sci-tech journals analyzed from paper output status of medical colleges and universities sci |
| 投稿时间：2013-06-08 修订日期：2013-06-08 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 医学高校 科技期刊 功能与定位 |
| 英文关键词: medical college and university sci-tech journal function and orientation |
| 基金项目:中国高校科技期刊研究会基金资助项目(GBJXB1116) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 965 |
| 全文下载次数: 720 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 通过中国知网收集国内20所医学院校相关信息,调查分析2006—2010年各院校发表科技论文的情况,各院校主办科技期刊的状况,拥有两院院士、长江学者情况以及国家级重点学科建设情况,比较各院校论文发表比例,分析各院校主办科技期刊及其与拥有两院院士、长江学者数量以及国家级重点学科建设的相关性。结果表明:重点学科论文在校内科技期刊发表的比例平均仅占25.45%,有10所院校重点学科论文80%以上发表在校外期刊,而有8所院校的学报刊发表本校重点学科论文不足10%,仅有3所院校超过30%；各院校拥有两院院士、长江学者数量与重点学科建设具有相关性(rs=0.706, rs=0.679,均P＜0.01),重点学科建设则与科技期刊的创办密切相关(rs=0.614, P＜0.01)。认为高校科技期刊特别是高校学报的功能与定位需要改革,高校科技期刊社与专家学者应共同努力提高高校科技期刊的影响力。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The objective of this paper is to discuss the function and orientation of university sci-tech journals. Related information of 20 medical colleges and universities was collected through the CNKI, scientific papers published from 2006 to 2010 in each institution were surveyed, and the sci-tech journals sponsored by each institution and the details of academicians, Changjiang scholars as well as the national key discipline construction were investigated. The 20 medical universities published 130 826 Chinese scientific papers from 2006 to 2010, including 42 374 (32.39%) papers sponsored by national key disciplines thesis project. Papers of key disciplines in the 20 medical universities published in the sci-tech journals sponsored by or not by the university from 2006 to 2010 were compared. The results show that the average proportion of key disciplines that published papers in journals sponsored by the university or college they belong to is only 25.45%. Ten universities published more than 80% of papers of key disciplines in journals outside their own university. There are eight institutions whose key disciplines publish less than 10% of the papers in their own journals, only three institutions over 30%. The number of academicians and Changjiang scholars and construction of key disciplines are correlated (rs= 0.706, rs= 0.679, all P<0.01), and the status of key discipline construction is closely related to possession of scientific journals (rs= 0.614, P<0.01). The function and orientation of university sci-tech journals need to be reformed. The experts and scholars of the university and journal publishing departments should work together to improve the influence of the journals |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
