| 赵秋民.正确处理文字复制比为0和＞40%的论文.编辑学报,2014,26(2):159-161 |
| 正确处理文字复制比为0和＞40%的论文 |
| Properly treat manuscripts with a copy ratio of zero or greater than 40 percent |
| 投稿时间：2011-09-29 修订日期：2011-09-29 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 学术论文 学术不端检测 文字复制比 |
| 英文关键词: sci-tech journal academic paper academic misconduct detection copy ratio |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1140 |
| 全文下载次数: 998 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 中国知网研制的“学术不端文献检测系统”(AMLC)在编辑初审稿件时其检测结果会出现文字复制比为0和＞40%这2种特殊情况。文章分析导致这2种检测结果的原因是:AMLC检测不出来的论文文字隐性重复以及论文文字复制比＞40%的论文中的格式性语言的重复、实验方法或操作步骤的重复,疾病的病理生理机制、治疗方案、结果判定(或疗效)标准的重复,以及统计学处理描述的重复,并给出比较具体的解决方案。建议编辑人员在处理上述情况时不完全依赖检测结果,要根据不同情况区别对待,利用专业知识区分有无抄袭以及抄袭与不当引用,正确使用AMLC提供的结果。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| CNKI's academic misconduct literature detection system (AMLC) plays an important role in the first check of manuscripts for editors. Two detection results are very common, that is, the copy ratio is 0 and copy ratio is greater than 40 percent. The author analyzes the causes of the two kinds of results. AMLC cannot detect the invisible repeat in the manuscripts, and those repeats in format language, experimental methods or procedures, pathophysiology mechanisms of diseases, treatment methods, result judgment (or effect) standard and statistical analysis description with a copy ratio greater than 40 percent. Also, it cannot offer specific solutions. The author suggests that editorial staff not depend on the test results solely when handling the above circumstances, but should treat them according to different conditions, make use of professional knowledge to distinguish copy, plagiarism and inappropriate use, and adopt the AMLC results properly. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
