| 程利冬,吕雪梅,李新美.《材料科学与工艺》2种审稿制度的比较.编辑学报,2014,26(4):349-350 |
| 《材料科学与工艺》2种审稿制度的比较 |
| Comparison of two review systems for Material Science and Technology |
| 投稿时间：2014-02-27 修订日期：2014-02-27 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 《材料科学与工艺》 审稿制度 编委 审稿专家 |
| 英文关键词: Material Science and Technology review system editorial board peer reviewer |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1003 |
| 全文下载次数: 893 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 介绍《材料科学与工艺》编辑部采用的2种审稿制度:“编辑部初审—专家外审—主编终审”和“编辑部初审—专家外审—专业编委审稿—当期责任编委终审”。从审稿流程、审稿周期、学术水平把关等方面分析各自的优缺点,指出了第2种审稿制度的优势以及面临的问题和解决的办法。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| This paper introduces two review systems for Material Science and Technology, i.e., "editor review-expert review-chief editor final review" and "editor review-expert review-professional board member review-responsible board member final review". From the viewpoint of the peer review process, review period and academic level control, their advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. Then, the advantages, problems and corresponding solutions of the second review system are pointed out. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
