| 徐志英.国外生物医学期刊:审稿人选择的研究及启示.编辑学报,2014,26(5):503-505 |
| 国外生物医学期刊:审稿人选择的研究及启示 |
| Analysis of foreign biomedical journals:enlightenment on the selection of peer reviewers |
| 投稿时间：2014-04-02 修订日期：2014-04-02 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 生物医学期刊 同行评议 审稿人 |
| 英文关键词: biomedical journals peer review reviewer |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 859 |
| 全文下载次数: 760 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 学术论文的发表极其依赖于高质量的同行评议,尽管同行评议不尽善尽美,但能帮助作者提高论文的写作水平以及编辑人员的编辑水平。研究发现,对审稿质量做出最佳贡献的预测因素包括是否为大学附属医院工作的审稿人或研究生毕业10年内的年轻人。目前进一步改善审稿方法的效果很有限,因此有专家建议对审稿人进行正规培训。期刊及其编辑在选择审稿人时,要考虑他们具备何种知识和技能,是否有丰富的审稿经验。这有助于期刊编辑出版单位选择到合适的审稿人,并提高审稿质量。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The publication of high-quality academic articles depends extremely on the high-quality professional peer review. Although the process of peer review may not be perfect, it improves the quality of authors' writing as well as the level of journal editors. Investigation of journal publication has revealed the best predictive factors on journal quality, including the peer reviewers who work or not at the affiliated hospital of university, or those younger reviewers who postgraduated within 10 years. Data from our electronic journals seem to be similar to the results from the investigation of foreign medical journals. Even now there are limitations for further improvement of article review, many specialists suggest to develop a standard training system to peer reviewers by arranging relevant courses, but its effectiveness still needs to be verified by long-term practice. Thus, a deep understanding of the reviewer's knowledge, skills as well as their review experience and their academic cognition will help the journal editors to select the suitable peer reviewers for their high quality publication. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
