| 万东升.期刊信赖度及其评价思路.编辑学报,2015,27(3):218-221 |
| 期刊信赖度及其评价思路 |
| Reliability of a journal and its evaluation methods |
| 投稿时间：2011-03-22 修订日期：2011-03-22 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 期刊信赖 信赖度 期刊管理 期刊评价 学术评价 |
| 英文关键词: trust in journal reliability journal management journal evaluation academic evaluation |
| 基金项目:全国高等学校文科学报研究会编辑学研究重点课题 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1053 |
| 全文下载次数: 713 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 本文认为:可从宏观层面和微观层面来进行期刊信赖度评价。在宏观层面上,主要是期刊利益相关主体对信赖度的主观感受和评价,这种评价方法是期刊利益相关主体基于某种利益考量和经验判断；而微观层面上,主要通过各种问卷调查法、文献评价法等,运用相关工具对信赖度进行比较细致的评估。不但要推动研究者重点从提高服务态度和服务质量入手而加强对期刊信赖度的研究,拓宽相关理论的广度和深度,还要深入进行期刊信赖度评价指标的探索和创新,以便更好地在编辑学研究、期刊评价和学术评价中发挥重要的作用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The reliability of a journal can be evaluated from the macro and micro levels. On the macro level, it is reflected in subjective feelings of involved main bodies and their evaluation on the reliability. On the micro level, reliability should be evaluated carefully through questionnaire, investigation, literature evaluation method, and related tools. It is suggested that scientific and social science researchers should enhance their research of journal reliability from the perspective of improving the quality and attitude of service, and expand the depth and width of relevant theories. Moreover, they should deepen the learning, innovation and exploration on journal reliability evaluation indexes to play a better function in standardization of relevant redactology, periodical evaluation and academic evaluation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
