| 黄雅意,黄锋.审稿专家再次审核“修后发表”修改稿的必要性.编辑学报,2016,28(1):53-54 |
| 审稿专家再次审核“修后发表”修改稿的必要性 |
| Necessity of checking revised manuscripts without retrial by reviewers |
| 投稿时间：2015-05-22 修订日期：2015-05-22 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技学术期刊 “修后发表”的修改稿 专家审核 学术质量 |
| 英文关键词: sci-tech academic journal revised manuscript without retrial check by reviewers academic quality |
| 基金项目:重庆市高校期刊研究会科研项目(CQSK201302)；重庆市出版专项资金重点学术期刊资助项目 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1216 |
| 全文下载次数: 1320 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 针对“修后发表”的修改稿,从保证期刊学术质量、提高审稿专家积极性、提高终审效率这3个方面,讨论审稿专家再次审核修改稿的优势,进一步分析可能存在的不足及相应的处理措施。结果显示,对于涉及论文实质内容的修改稿,通过审稿专家再次审核,可以更好地保证论文和期刊的学术质量。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The advantages for reviewers to check the revised manuscripts without retrial are discussed from three aspects followed by ensuring the academic quality of sci-tech journals, improving the enthusiasm of the reviewers, and speeding the process of final review. Furthermore, the disadvantages which may exist are also illustrated, and some corresponding measures are provided. Results show that, as for the revised manuscripts which may relate to the major content of the paper, checking by reviewers is very necessary to ensure the academic quality of the journal. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
