文章摘要
李晶,张嵘,相艳.“编委送审制”初探及与“编辑送审制”比较——以《北京航空航天大学学报》为例.编辑学报,2016,28(2):153-155
“编委送审制”初探及与“编辑送审制”比较——以《北京航空航天大学学报》为例
Invitation for peer review by editorial board members and comparison with invitation by editorial staff members:Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics as example
投稿时间:2015-10-28  修订日期:2015-10-28
DOI:
中文关键词: 送审模式  编委送审制  编辑送审制  审稿速度  比较
英文关键词: mode of invitation for peer review  invitation for peer review by editorial board members  invitation for peer review by editorial staff  speed of reviewing a manuscript  comparison
基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(5010002015407001)
作者单位
李晶 《北京航空航天大学学报》编辑部,100191,北京 
张嵘 《北京航空航天大学学报》编辑部,100191,北京 
相艳 北京航空航天大学基础与人文社科研究院:100191,北京 
摘要点击次数: 130
全文下载次数: 180
中文摘要:
      以《北京航空航天大学学报》为例,阐明“编委送审制”的运行模式,并就送审时间和审回时间,以统计学方法与“编辑送审制”进行比较,体现出它在提高审稿速度上的优势。提出了完善和创新审稿模式的措施。
英文摘要:
      Invitation for peer review is the key link of ensuring the academic quality of sci-tech journals. Taking Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics as an example, the operation mode of the invitation for peer review by editorial board members is explained. Then the sending and receipt time of peer review with the invitation for peer review by editorial staff are compared using statistics. The results show the advantages of invitation for peer review by editorial board members. Finally the measures how to improve and innovate the system of invitation for peer review are put forward.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭