文章摘要
宋国营,常春,苏楠,张媛,郭瑞,石朝云,熊曾.利用GoWeb、PubMed及ISIS系统评价医学期刊对研究热点的把握度.编辑学报,2016,28(5):453-456
利用GoWeb、PubMed及ISIS系统评价医学期刊对研究热点的把握度
Application of GoWeb, PubMed and ISIS system in evaluating the grasp on research hotspots for domestic medical journals
投稿时间:2016-03-18  修订日期:2016-03-18
DOI:
中文关键词: 文献计量学  机制  研究  学术影响力
英文关键词: biliometrics  mechanism  research  academic impact
基金项目: 利用GoWeb、PubMed及ISIS系统评价医学期刊对研究热点的把握度[KH*2/3D]宋国营1) 常春2) 苏楠3) 张媛1) 郭瑞1) 石朝云4) 熊曾5)1)中华医学会《中华医学杂志》编辑部,100710,北京;2)北京大学第三医院呼吸科,100191,北京;3)中日友好医院呼吸内科,100029,北京;4)中华医学会杂志社,100710,北京;5)中南大学湘雅医院放射科,410008,长沙[KH*2/3D]〖FL
作者单位
宋国营 中华医学会《中华医学杂志》编辑部,100710,北京 
常春 北京大学第三医院呼吸科,100191,北京 
苏楠 中日友好医院呼吸内科,100029,北京 
张媛 中华医学会《中华医学杂志》编辑部,100710,北京 
郭瑞 中华医学会《中华医学杂志》编辑部,100710,北京 
石朝云 中华医学会杂志社,100710,北京 
熊曾 中南大学湘雅医院放射科,410008,长沙 
摘要点击次数: 229
全文下载次数: 489
中文摘要:
      以哮喘机制研究为例,使用GoWeb生物医学专业搜索引擎搜索学科领域研究热点,以PubMed文献检索服务系统来源的国外权威期刊和ISIS系统检索获得的国家自然科学基金项目为评价标准,比较国内权威医学期刊对学科领域研究热点及其发展趋势的把握度。结果发现,免疫学、气道重塑、表观遗传学为哮喘机制研究3大热点,三者发文量或项目数占比之和由高到低排列分别为《中华医学杂志》(96.0%)、国家自然科学基金项目(89.5%)、国外权威期刊(87.0%)、《中华结核与呼吸杂志》(75.7%)。与国外权威期刊及国家自然科学基金项目相比较,国内权威期刊中免疫学机制比例较高,而气道重建比例较低,表观遗传学研究见于国外权威期刊、国家自然科学基金项目及《中华医学杂志》中,发文量或项目数占比基本相当;在国内期刊中,《中华医学杂志》对哮喘机制研究热点的把握度较好。基于GoWeb对科技期刊研究领域进行对比分析有利于医学期刊及其编辑把握有关领域的研究热点及其发展趋势,组织发表紧跟国际研究热点的高水平的医学科研论文。
英文摘要:
      In this study, the professional biomedicine search engine, GoWeb, was used to search hotspots of the subject areas with asthma mechanism as an example. Research hotspots from the international authoritative medical journals retrieved by the document retrieval service system, PubMed, and programs from National Natural Science Foundation of China were used as evaluation criterion to compare the grasp on research hotspots and trends among domestic authoritative medical journals. The results showed that, immunology, airway remodeling and epigenetics were the three main research hotspots of the asthma mechanism study. The percentage of papers or programs focusing on these area was 96.0% for National Medical Journal of China, 89.5% for National Natural Science Foundation of China, 87.0% for international authoritative medical journals, 75.7% for Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, respectively. Compared with the international authoritative medical journals and National Natural Science Foundation of China, the percentage of papers focusing on immunology in domestic authoritative medical journals was higher, while percentage of airway remodeling was lower. The epigenetics studies were equally seen in the international authoritative medical journals, programs of National Natural Science Foundation of China and National Medical Journal of China. The grasp on search hotspots of asthma mechanism study of National Medical Journal of China was better than Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. Comparative analysis of hot research fields among medical journals based on GoWeb is beneficial for the journals and the editors of the journals to follow research hotspots of related areas and predict research trends, and furthermore, to publish high-level medical research papers.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭