文章摘要
代小秋.客观评价审稿贡献消除同行评议瓶颈.编辑学报,2017,29(5):416-419
客观评价审稿贡献消除同行评议瓶颈
Objectively evaluating the contribution of manuscript review to solve the bottleneck of peer review//
投稿时间:2017-03-27  修订日期:2017-03-27
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2017.05.003
中文关键词: 科技期刊  同行评议  鼓励机制
英文关键词: sci-tech journal  peer review  incentive mechanism Author’s address\ Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Oncology,National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College,100021,Beijing,China DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2017.05.003[KH*2/3]〖HS
基金项目:[KH*2/3D]客观评价审稿贡献消除同行评议瓶颈[KH*2/3D]〖JZ
作者单位
代小秋 国家癌症中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院《中华肿瘤杂志》编辑部,100021,北京 
摘要点击次数: 1553
全文下载次数: 583
中文摘要:
      为了应对专业期刊审稿工作的困境,对国外平台审稿工作的奖励方法进行分析,旨在使审稿人的审稿工作得到经济或学术的认可。认为应建立合理的度量审稿工作的指标,寻找有效的方法来激励审稿人积极参与期刊的审稿工作,以调动审稿人审稿的积极性,从而促进期刊学术水平的提高。
英文摘要:
      In order to face the dilemma of peer review, this article intends to discuss reward approach of foreign peer-review system. It aims to make the peer reviewers’ work economically or academically recognized, to establish reasonable evaluating indicators for peer review, and to find an effective way to motivate reviewers to actively participate in the review work of periodicals, so as to arouse the enthusiasm of reviewers to review manuscripts, and thus to promote the development of academic level of periodicals. Keywords\ sci-tech journal;peer review;incentive mechanism Author’s address\ Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Oncology,National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College,100021,Beijing,China DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2017.05.003[KH*2/3]〖HS
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭