文章摘要
曾群,龚胜生,刘建超.论科技期刊论文审稿人的学术评价.编辑学报,2018,30(3):234-236
论科技期刊论文审稿人的学术评价
On the academic evaluation by peer reviewers of sci-tech journal articles
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2018.03.004
中文关键词: 科技论文  审稿人  学术创新  学术评价  评价主体
英文关键词: sci-tech article  peer reviewer  academic innovation  academic evaluation  main body of evaluation Authors’ address
基金项目:
作者单位
曾群 华中师范大学学报编辑部
华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院:430079,武汉 
龚胜生 华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院:430079,武汉 
刘建超 华中师范大学学报编辑部 
摘要点击次数: 65
全文下载次数: 53
中文摘要:
      论文审稿人的学术评价不仅是决定文章是否可以刊出的重要依据,也是提高期刊学术影响力的重要手段。审稿人学术评价的主要内容是在科学的基础上进行的学术创新性评价,学术创新又需要学术评价来引导,二者相辅相成。审稿人是学术评价的主体,应该从科学问题的甄判、研究意义的评价、学术创新的评价等多方面对论文作出全面、具体、公正的评价。
英文摘要:
      The peer reviewers’ academic evaluation is not only an important basis to determine whether the article can be published, but also an important means to improve the academic influence of journals. The main content of the academic evaluation of peer reviewers is the evaluation of academic innovation, which is based on the science, and the academic innovation needs academic evaluation to guide them, which supplement each other. The peer reviewers are the main body of academic evaluation, who should evaluate comprehensively, concretely and impartially from the aspects of scientific questions, research significance, and academic innovation.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭