文章摘要
张祥合,王丹,赵莹莹,田海江.“公评公正公开”式审稿机制的探索与实践.编辑学报,2018,30(4):382-385
“公评公正公开”式审稿机制的探索与实践
Exploration and practice of public peer review mechanism//
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2018.04.013
中文关键词: 学术期刊  审稿机制  开放审稿  审稿系统  公评审稿
英文关键词: academic journal  peer review mechanism  open peer review  peer review system  public peer review
基金项目:*中国科学技术期刊编辑学会基金面上项目(2017MSA2)
作者单位
张祥合 吉林大学学报工学版 编辑部 
王丹 仿生工程学报编辑部:130022长春 
赵莹莹 吉林大学学报工学版 编辑部 
田海江 重庆邮电大学期刊社400065重庆 
摘要点击次数: 150
全文下载次数: 100
中文摘要:
      针对科技期刊审稿过程中,由于作者和专家信息不透明导致的审稿不公平以及审稿专家选择不合适导致许多稿件无法得到及时处理的问题,本文通过调查问卷和找代表座谈的方式研究了公开审稿的机制和实现方法,提出了一种“公评公正公开”式审稿机制(Public Peer Review System,PPRS),并设计了可与多数编辑部所用稿件采编系统相连通的软件实现系统。一段时间的正式使用结果显示,该系统可在较大程度上解决审稿过程中找专家难、意见返回难的问题。
英文摘要:
      In the peer review process of scientific journals, the information of authors and reviewers are hidden for each other, which may result in the unfair review. The improper choice of reviewers often leads to delayed handling of many manuscripts. In this paper, an open peer review mechanism and its realization method are investigated by questionnaire and symposium. A public, fair, and open peer review mechanism is proposed. The corresponding review system is designed, which can match with the manuscript management systems of many editorial offices. After a period of practice, we think the new review system can solve problems to a great extent, such as hardly finding suitable reviewers, low-efficiency review process.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭