| 王凤产.同行评审的新趋势.编辑学报,2018,30(5):547-550 |
| 同行评审的新趋势 |
| New trends in peer review |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2018.05.032 |
| 中文关键词: 开放性同行评审 非选择性同行评审 开放预审稿件的公众评审 便携式同行评审 反弹式同行评审 背书式同行评审 |
| 英文关键词: open peer review non-selective peer review public review of open pre-reviewed manuscripts portable peer review rebound peer review peer review by endorsement |
| 基金项目:*中国高校科技期刊研究会专项(CUJS2017－016)；河南省高等学校重点科研项目(18A180020)；河南省重点科技公关项目(172102310721) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1870 |
| 全文下载次数: 920 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为避免传统同行评审形式出现的诸多弊端,学术出版界不断探索新的同行评议方法,出现了诸多的创新。本文主要对当前正在尝试的新兴同行评审方法进行调查,并介绍相关经验。这些创新方法包括开放性同行评审、非选择性同行评审、开放预审稿件的公众评审、便携式同行评审、反弹式同行评审、背书式同行评审。调查结果显示,同行评审实践发生了巨大的变化,与互联网革命和开放获取出版紧密相关,科学出版商为作者提供了更多的选择,新的同行评议形式为学术交流注入了新的活力。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In order to avoid many shortcomings in the traditional form of peer review, the academic publishing community has continuously explored new methods for peer review, and there have been many innovations. This paper mainly investigates the emerging peer review methods and introduces relevant experiences. These innovative methods include:open peer review, non-selective peer review, public review of open pre-reviewed manuscripts, portable peer review, rebound peer review, and peer review by endorsement. The survey results indicate a sea change in peer review practices, tightly linked to the internet revolution and to the emergence of open access publishing. Scientific publishers offer authors greater choice, and new forms of peer review have injected new vitality into academic exchanges. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
