文章摘要
盛怡瑾,胡克兴,刘徽,韩丽.同行评议形式中的编辑权力分析.编辑学报,2019,31(2):148-151
同行评议形式中的编辑权力分析
Analysis of editorial power in the forms of peer review
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2019.02.008
中文关键词: 同行评议形式  编辑权力  影响
英文关键词: peer review form  editorial power  influence
基金项目:* 中国科协科技期刊青年编辑业务研究择优支持项目(castqk2017-qnkt-05) 
作者单位
盛怡瑾 中国科学院文献情报中心,100190
中国科学院大学经济与管理学院,100190 
胡克兴 《中国科学》杂志社,100717 
刘徽 《中国科学》杂志社,100717 
韩丽 中国科学院微生物研究所《菌物学报》编辑部,100101:北京〖FL 
摘要点击次数: 1178
全文下载次数: 951
中文摘要:
      从编辑的角度出发,探索不同同行评议形式下的编辑权力特点及变化,并深入阐述编辑权力的意义及影响,加深人们对同行评议各形式的理解并引起人们对编辑权力、编辑感受的重视,为编辑部实施、变革、改善同行评议,研究者更全面地看待和设计各种形式提供参考。编辑权力过小带来编辑自身的束缚感,过大带来权力滥用的可能,如何从中平衡是未来研究者设计和构建新的形式、编辑部实践改进的同行评议形式必须考虑的重要问题。
英文摘要:
      This paper explores the characteristics and changes of editorial power in different peer review forms from the perspective of editor, and elaborates on the meaning and influence of editorial power, in order to deepen people’s understanding of various forms of peer review and draw people’s attention to editorial power and editorial feelings. The paper provides reference for the editorial department in the implementation, change, and improvement of peer review, and the researchers in view and design of various forms in a more comprehensive way. If the editorial power is too small, it will bring the editor’s own sense of restraint. If too big, it will bring the possibility of power abuse. How to balance is an important issue that must be considered by future researchers to design and construct new forms and the editorial department to improve the practice.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭