文章摘要
武建虎,郭青,刘冬妍,张楠,尤伟杰.科技学术期刊编辑交叉审读的意义及应注意的“5性”.编辑学报,2019,31(5):506-508, 512
科技学术期刊编辑交叉审读的意义及应注意的“5性”
Significance of editors’ cross-reading of academic journal and five principles that editors should have
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2019.05.008
中文关键词: 交叉审读  学术期刊  三审制  出版质量  逻辑性
英文关键词: cross reading  academic journal  three level system for examining a manuscript  publication quality  logicality
基金项目:
作者单位
武建虎 《武警医学》编辑部,102613,北京〖FL 
郭青 《武警医学》编辑部,102613,北京〖FL 
刘冬妍 《武警医学》编辑部,102613,北京〖FL 
张楠 《武警医学》编辑部,102613,北京〖FL 
尤伟杰 《武警医学》编辑部,102613,北京〖FL 
摘要点击次数: 45
全文下载次数: 51
中文摘要:
      学术期刊编辑部实行编辑交叉审读效果很好,主要意义:减少文章中的错误,促进期刊规范统一,加快稿件处理速度,有利于提高编辑能力。意识决定行动,行动的效果如何一定程度上取决于是否有正确的意识。编辑交叉审读至少应具有“5性”:逻辑性、一致性、层次性、规范性和美观性。
英文摘要:
      The effect of cross-examination of editors in editorial department of academic journals is very important, which are:reduce errors in articles, promote the standardization and unification of periodicals, speed up processing of manuscripts, improve editorial ability. Consciousness determines action, the effect of action depends to a certain extent on the correct awareness. Editors should have at least five principles of cross-examination:logicality, uniformity, hierarchy, normality, and beauty.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭