| 徐文娟.关于中文学术期刊开放获取的再思考.编辑学报,2019,31(5):523-526, 530 |
| 关于中文学术期刊开放获取的再思考 |
| Thoughts on open access of Chinese academic journals |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2019.05.013 |
| 中文关键词: 开放获取 OA2020 中文学术期刊 开放获取障碍 金色OA |
| 英文关键词: open access OA2020 Chinese academic journals obstacles to OA golden OA |
| 基金项目:*基金项目 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1052 |
| 全文下载次数: 1053 |
| 中文摘要: |
| S计划的提出将开放获取(Open Access, OA)提升到一个新的高度,对于中文学术期刊的OA必须深入思考。在OA2020的推进过程中,学术出版不同环节经历着长期的博弈和努力,而绝大多数中文学术期刊由于存在着主观和客观上的障碍,只在自建网站上实施了OA。为了推进高质量中文学术期刊金色OA并达到知识普惠社会发展的要求,笔者认为应该允许相关期刊收取合理的文章处理费,充分利用现有的OA平台,并探索在期刊集成平台上的OA。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| As the proposal of S plan will push the open access (OA) to a new height, the OA of Chinese academic journal must be considered in deeply. In the process of promoting OA2020, different strategies of the academic publishing have experienced long-term games and efforts, the divergence of open access is focused on the international publishers. Due to the subjective and objective obstacles to OA, most Chinese academic journals only implement open access on their self-established websites. In order to promote high-quality Chinese academic journals become golden OA and to meet the requirements of scientific knowledge, we think it is necessary to allow charging Article Processing Charge (APC) of the relevant journals, make full use of the existing open access platforms, and explore open access on the major Chinese integrated journal platforms. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
