| 吴洋.加强系统综述/meta分析类论文来稿的编辑审查.编辑学报,2020,32(1):37-40 |
| 加强系统综述/meta分析类论文来稿的编辑审查 |
| Strengthen the editorial review on systematic reviews/meta-analysis manuscripts |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2020.01.009 |
| 中文关键词: 系统综述 meta分析 Cochrane手册 PRISMA声明 编辑审查 |
| 英文关键词: systematic review meta-analysis Cochrane handbook PRISMA statement editorial review |
| 基金项目:*2019年上海市文教结合“高水平高校学术期刊支持计划”项目 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 962 |
| 全文下载次数: 884 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 根据国外Cochrane手册、PRISMA声明、PRISMA-P声明等指南,结合实际工作经验,提出医学编辑在审查中应当注意的事项。探讨在系统综述/meta分析类论文来稿量大增的背景下,如何加强编辑审查。对于系统综述/meta分析类论文来稿,编辑应当加强对文献检索、文献筛选、文献的纳入和排除、文献质量、潜在的利益冲突和报告中干预措施的伤害性等方面的审查。不要认为专家外审通过的来稿,便一定是可以发表的合格稿件。目前,系统综述/meta分析类论文泛滥,加强对该类论文的编辑审查刻不容缓。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| According to the Cochrane handbook, PRISMA statement, PRISMA-P statement, and combining with experience of practical editing, we aim to strengthen the editorial review on systematic reviews/meta-analysis manuscripts. For systematic review/meta-analysis manuscripts, medical editors should strengthen the review of literature retrieval, literature screening, literature inclusion and exclusion, paper quality, potential conflicts of interest, and the harm of interventions in reporting, etc. We think manuscripts approved by peer-reviewers may not be qualified for publishing. With more and more systematic review/meta-analysis papers submitted, it is imperative to strengthen the editorial review of such papers. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
