| 张同学.科技期刊政治性差错几种处理方法的比较与分析.编辑学报,2020,32(2):163-165 |
| 科技期刊政治性差错几种处理方法的比较与分析 |
| Comparing analysis of methods of treating political errors in scientific journals |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2020.02.010 |
| 中文关键词: 政治性差错 更正 科技期刊 |
| 英文关键词: political errors correction scientific journals |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 884 |
| 全文下载次数: 817 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为了给科技期刊编辑同人正确处理政治性差错提供参考,比较分析了科技期刊出版实践中处理政治性差错的4种方法,即:期刊出版单位刊登更正声明,并作替换处理；网络传播平台加编者注,仅作统一更正说明；期刊出版单位明知有差错,但不作任何处理；期刊出版单位不刊登更正声明,但更换错误文档。认为期刊出版单位是责任主体,期刊出现政治性差错,期刊出版单位公开更正是出版法规的要求,期刊出版单位应在收录期刊的所有网络数据库中刊登电子版的更正声明,更正声明连同原始文档、替换文档附在原始论文的检索页。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In order to provide reference for the editors of scientific journals to deal with the political errors correctly, this paper compared and analyzed four kinds of treatment methods of political errors in the publishing of scientific journals:(1) the journal publisher publishing a correction statement and making a replacement, (2) the network communication platform adding the editor’s note and only making a correction explanation, (3) the journal publisher knowing the existing political errors but taking no measures, and (4) the journal publisher making no statement of correction but replacing the paper containing political errors. This paper points out that the journal publisher is the main body of responsibility. If there are political errors in its journal, open correction by the journal publisher is required by the publishing laws and regulations. The journal publisher should publish the electronic correction statement in all the network databases of the journal, and the correction statement, together with the original document and the replacement document, should be attached to the retrieval page of the original paper. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
