| 李军.略论现行评价机制的历史作用及其危害.编辑学报,2021,(2):119-128, 146 |
| 略论现行评价机制的历史作用及其危害 |
| Thoughts on the historical functions and shortcomings of the current research evaluation mechanism in China |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2021.02.001 |
| 中文关键词: SCI “唯SCI”危害 评价机制 改革 政策 ’ |
| 英文关键词: SCI shortcomings of “only SCI” evaluation mechanism reform policy |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1120 |
| 全文下载次数: 804 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 党中央国务院做出关于深化评价体系改革工作决策部署以来,各地各有关部门加快制定意见,做出具体安排,加快组织实施。以习近平总书记一系列重要讲话为进军令,以中央《关于深化人才发展体制机制改革的意见》《关于分类推进人才评价机制改革的指导意见》等为总部署,评价机制改革纳入中央全面深化改革总盘子,人才评价制度各项工作统筹推进。改革现行评价机制,核心是建立以科技创新质量、贡献、绩效为导向的分类评价体系,正确评价科技创新成果的科学价值、技术价值、经济价值、社会价值、文化价值。突出问题和重点治理工作是,针对当前科研评价中存在的SCI论文相关指标片面、过度、扭曲使用等现象,分类制定评价机制,采取定性定量相结合的多元评价标准,坚决清理和纠正包括以“唯SCI”及以“唯论文”为突出表现的“四唯”倾向,正确发挥评价指挥棒学术导向作用,避免学术评价功能失衡、异化,把科研人员从不合理的负担中解脱出来。本文立足中央关于深入开展的评价机制改革的全局,针对当前评价机制改革中的一些模糊认识,全面客观地论述了SCI引入我国的历史作用,系统分析了“唯SCI”的现实危害,提出对评价机制改革精神的若干思考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Since the CPC Central Committee and the State Council made policies on deepening the reform of research evaluation system, the relevant departments in China have accelerated the formulation of measures, made specific arrangements, and accelerated the organization and implementation. Taking a series of important speeches by general secretary Xi Jinping as guide, and based on the Central Committee’s “Opinions on deepening the reform of talent development system and mechanism” and “Guiding opinions on the reform of classification and promotion of talent evaluation mechanism” as general arrangements, the reform of the evaluation mechanism has been brought into the overall plan of comprehensively deepen the reform by the central government, and the work of the talent evaluation system has been promoted as a whole. The core of reforming the current evaluation mechanism is to establish a classified evaluation system oriented by the quality, contribution and performance of scientific and technological innovation, and correctly evaluate the scientific value, technical value, economic value, social value and cultural value of scientific and technological innovation achievements. In view of the phenomenon of one-sided, excessive and distorted use of relevant indicators of SCI papers in the current scientific research evaluation, we think the outstanding problems and key governance work are as the following:1) formulating the evaluation mechanism by classification; 2) adopting the multiple evaluation standards of combining qualitative and quantitative; 3) resolutely cleaning up and correcting the “four only” tendency, including “only SCI” as the outstanding performance; 4) correctly playing the academic guiding role of the evaluation baton, and avoiding academic evaluation unbalanced and alienated; 5) freeing researchers from unreasonable burden. Based on the overall situation of the central government’s in-depth reform of the evaluation mechanism, this paper comprehensively and objectively discusses the historical role of the introduction of SCI into China, and systematically analyzes the practical shortcomings of “only SCI” in research evaluation, and duscusses the main spirit and policy logic of the reform. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
