| 谢文鸿.创新效能感在护理期刊审稿人科研能力与创新绩效间的中介效应及其对培养优秀审稿人的启示.编辑学报,2021,(2):221-225 |
| 创新效能感在护理期刊审稿人科研能力与创新绩效间的中介效应及其对培养优秀审稿人的启示 |
| Mediating effect of innovative efficacy between scientific research ability and innovation performance in reviewers of scientific journals and its enlightenment on how to train excellent reviewers |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2021.02.024 |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 审稿人 创新效能感 科研能力 创新绩效 中介效应 |
| 英文关键词: scientific journal reviewer innovative efficacy scientific research ability innovation performance mediating effect |
| 基金项目:*中国高校科技期刊研究会青年基金(CUJS-QN-2018-018)；广东省科学技术期刊编辑学会2020年基金项目(202044) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 646 |
| 全文下载次数: 593 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 分析护理科技期刊审稿人创新效能感在科研能力与创新绩效间的中介效应,并探讨如何培养优秀审稿人,以优化审稿人队伍并提高护理科技期刊审稿人的审稿水平。采用一般资料问卷、创新效能感量表、科研能力自评量表及创新绩效量表,以网络发放方式对护理科技期刊审稿人进行调查。护理科技期刊审稿人创新效能感得分为(31.50±5.11)分,得分指标为78.75%；科研能力得分为(95.36±17.39)分,得分指标为79.47%；创新绩效得分为(33.60±4.47)分,得分指标为84.00%。创新绩效与科研能力及创新效能感总体呈正相关(r=0.495,r=0.741,均P＜0.001)。多元线性回归结果显示,科研能力及创新效能感进入创新绩效回归方程(标准系数β=0.166～0.640,P＜0.05)。护理科技期刊审稿人创新绩效处于中等偏上水平,创新效能感在科研能力与创新绩效间起到部分中介效应(中介效应为33.4%),通过举办护理科研学术沙龙、护理科研培训班、倡导知识共享等措施以提高其创新效能感与科研能力,进而提升其创新绩效；通过培养优秀审稿人以提高其审稿质量,进而提升护理科技期刊的论文质量及期刊影响力。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| This paper aims to analyze mediating effect of innovative efficacy between scientific research ability and innovation performance in reviewers of nursing scientific journals, explore how to train excellent reviewers, in order to optimize the reviewer team and improve the level of reviewers for nursing scientific journals. Reviewers of nursing scientific journal were investigated by general information questionnaire, innovation efficacy scale, scientific research ability self-evaluation rating scale and innovation performance scale, which was conducted online. The total score of innovative efficacy of reviewers is 31.50±5.11,and the score index is 78.75%.The total score of scientific research ability of reviewers is 95.36±17.39,and the score index is 79.47%.The total score of innovation performance of reviewers is 33.60±4.47,and the score index is 84.00%. Innovation performance was positively correlated with scientific research ability and innovation efficacy (r=0.495, r=0.741, all P<0.001). The results of multiple linear regression show that scientific research ability and innovation efficacy entered the regression equation of innovation performance (standard coefficient β=0.166-0.640, P<0.05). The mediating effect of innovation efficacy is 33.4%. The innovation performance of reviewers is above the middle level. The innovative efficacy plays a partial intermediary role between scientific research ability and innovation performance. By means of holding nursing research academic salon, nursing research training class, advocating knowledge sharing, journals can improve the reviewers’ innovative efficacy and scientific research ability, improve their innovation performance, cultivate excellent reviewers to improve the quality of their review, and thus improve the quality of papers and influence of nursing scientific journals. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
