文章摘要
贾建敏,吴爱民,赵翠翠,杨颖,毛文明.医学高校学报通过文献数据库扩增有效审稿专家的实践和成效.编辑学报,2021,(3):309-312
医学高校学报通过文献数据库扩增有效审稿专家的实践和成效
Practice and achievements of amplifying effective reviewers through literature database in journals of medical universities
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2021.03.017
中文关键词: 医学高校学报  同行评议  有效审稿专家  文献数据库
英文关键词: journals of medical universities  peer review  effective reviewer  literature database
基金项目:*温州市基础性软科学研究项目(R20190011) 
作者单位
贾建敏 温州医科大学图书馆(期刊社)325035浙江温州 
吴爱民 温州医科大学图书馆(期刊社)325035浙江温州 
赵翠翠 温州医科大学图书馆(期刊社)325035浙江温州 
杨颖 温州医科大学图书馆(期刊社)325035浙江温州 
毛文明 温州医科大学图书馆(期刊社)325035浙江温州 
摘要点击次数: 28
全文下载次数: 54
中文摘要:
      同行评议是保证期刊学术质量的关键环节。医学高校学报因学科范围广、来稿量大、“本校性”特点、部分专家审稿积极性差、需专业对口的“小同行”审稿专家等原因,需要不断扩增学术水平高、愿意审稿、审稿效率和质量高、研究方向对口、与待审稿件不存在利益冲突并且身份真实可靠的有效审稿专家,以提高审稿效率和审稿质量。我们结合工作实践提出通过检索权威文献数据库筛选审稿专家、核实审稿专家身份、登记详细信息、评价审稿质量等环节扩增有效审稿专家。通过实践,杂志的稿件审稿周期和出版周期均有所缩短,稿源也有所增加。
英文摘要:
      Peer review is a critical part to ensure the academic quality of journals. Due to the wide range of disciplines, the large amount of contributions, the characteristics of "our school", the poor enthusiasm of some reviewers, and the need for "small peer" reviewers, journals of medical universities need to continuously expand effective reviewers with high academic level, willing to review manuscripts, high efficiency and quality of reviewing manuscripts, related research direction, no conflict of interest with pending manuscripts, and authentic and reliable identity to improve the efficiency and quality of peer review. Based on the work practice, the author proposes to select reviewers by searching author via literature database, verify reviewers’ identities, register detailed information, and evaluate reviewers’ quality to amplify effective reviewers. Through practice, the periodicity of manuscript review and publication has been shortened, and the source of manuscripts has been expanded.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭