| 印波,唐淑臣,范林.科技期刊编辑执业中的刑事风险及其防范.编辑学报,2021,(4):372-377 |
| 科技期刊编辑执业中的刑事风险及其防范 |
| The criminal risk in the practice of scientific journal editors and its prevention |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2021.04.005 |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊编辑 刑事风险 腐败犯罪 合规机制 “三不一体” |
| 英文关键词: scientific journal editors criminal risk corruption crime compliance mechanism three nots in an organic whole |
| 基金项目:*国家自然科学基金项目(S2024003,71843009)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目(2019SSYB01) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 299 |
| 全文下载次数: 383 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在科技期刊论文发表的过程中,期刊编辑具有一定的决策权。如果编辑缺乏足够的外在约束与内在自律,则可能会做出失范行为,并随之可能产生刑事风险,尤其是腐败犯罪风险。以“个案－规范”范式对科技期刊编辑的刑事风险进行归纳、分析,可以管窥风险的来源:一些科技期刊编辑的法律红线意识淡薄,而相应的监管体系却较为松散。为防范刑事风险,实现科技期刊出版事业的良性发展,期刊编辑部应当建立相应的内部合规机制,期刊编辑应强化风险观念和底线思维,针对相对高发的腐败犯罪风险,践行一体推进不敢腐、不能腐、不想腐的“三不一体”反腐基准。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In the process of publishing articles in scientific journals, the editors have a certain extent of decision-making power. If sufficient external restraint and internal self-discipline is absent, they would make anomie behavior. And this may increase criminal risk, especially the risk of corruption crime. This article summarizes and analyzes the criminal risks of scientific journal editors with the paradigm of “case-norm”, and speculates on the sources of the risks. Some scientific journals editors have little awareness of the legal red-lines, while the corresponding regulatory system is relatively loose. In order to prevent criminal risk, realize the benign development of scientific journal publishing business, editorial departments should establish corresponding internal compliance mechanism, and journal editors should strengthen risk conception and bottom-line thinking. In view of the relatively high risk of corruption crimes, the anti-graft bench mark of “three nots in an organic whole” including “dare not be corrupt”, “can’t be corrupt” and “do not want to be corrupt” shall be promoted. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
