文章摘要
梁明修,孙培杰,吕相征,游苏宁.应高度重视医药学期刊论文中国家自然科学基金的标注不当行为.编辑学报,2022,(5):532-537
应高度重视医药学期刊论文中国家自然科学基金的标注不当行为
Call for a stop to misuse of declaration of the National Natural Science Foundation of China funding in academic journal articles
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2022.05.013
中文关键词: 国家自然科学基金  不妥行为  医药学期刊
英文关键词: National Natural Science Foundation of China  misconduct  medical and pharmacology journals
基金项目:
作者单位
梁明修 《中华医学杂志》编辑部,100052,北京
医学期刊知识挖掘与服务重点实验室,100052,北京 
孙培杰 中国医科大学公共卫生学院,110122,沈阳 
吕相征 《中华医学杂志》编辑部,100052,北京
医学期刊知识挖掘与服务重点实验室,100052,北京 
游苏宁 中华医学会继续教育部,100710,北京 
摘要点击次数: 121
全文下载次数: 451
中文摘要:
      为进一步了解学术期刊论文中国家自然科学基金(国自然基金)的标注不当情况,以医药学期刊为例,识别医药学论文基金标注过程中出现的问题,为我国医药学营造公平公正的科研环境提供科学依据。国自然基金标注不当行为较为普遍,但百杰期刊明显优于非百杰期刊。建议管理部门出台相应的政策和规范,取消或弱化“基金论文比”这一期刊评价指标,并搭建有效查询基金项目的平台,同时加强对作者的学术道德教育,提升编辑的期刊发展认知,破除“唯基金”论的谬误,营造风清气正的论文发表氛围。
英文摘要:
      In order to further understand mislabeling situation in academic journals by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), we took medical and pharmacology journals as an example, to identify the problems in the labeling process of medical and pharmacology papers, and to provide scientific basis for creating a fair scientific research environment for Chinese medicine. Mislabeling of NSFC is common in China, but hundred outstanding journals are significantly better than non-hundred outstanding journals as a whole. It is suggested that the management department should formulate relevant policies and norms, cancel or weaken the “ratio of fund paper” as the evaluation index of journals, set up an effective platform to inquire the fund projects, strengthen the academic moral education of the authors, improve the editors’ understanding of the journal development, break the error of the fund-only theory, and establish a clean and upright atmosphere for the publication of papers.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭