|
| SCI指挥棒对中文科技期刊影响的实证研究 |
| An empirical study on the influence of SCI baton on Chinese Sci-tech Journals——Data analysis based on 16 provincial agricultural universities in China |
| 投稿时间：2022-09-13 修订日期：2022-10-19 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: SCI 指挥棒 评价机制 对策建议 |
| 英文关键词: SCI baton evaluation mechanism countermeasures and suggestions |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 69 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 以“唯 SCI”“唯论文”为突出表现的“四唯”倾向导致的学术和出版生态异化直接威胁到我国中文科技期刊的生存和发展。基于全国16所省属农业高校2006—2020年的数据分析发现,就中国知网收录的中文期刊科技论文篇数而言,各农业高校间的关系没有规律,其总论文收录数基本平稳在18 262~18 683篇之间；就国外SCI论文收录的论文篇数而言,各农业高校间呈密切的关系,且呈极显著的正强相关,其总论文收录数逐年呈指数倍数增加；随着各高校SCI源期刊论文发表数的迅速增加,中文期刊的论文发表数没有增加,甚至略有下降,说明随着SCI在各类评价体系中指挥棒作用的加强,中文期刊稿源相对减少,尤其表明国内优质论文外流现象非常严重。被异化了的SCI,既偏离了科技期刊学术传播的本位,也对中文科技期刊的有序良性发展带来不可估量的负面效应。政府、高校及办刊人都应当直面问题,探索解决之道,真正贯彻落实习近平总书记“把论文写在祖国的大地上”的重要指示精神,切实提升以农业高校学报为代表的中文科技期刊的创新力和影响力。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The ecological alienation in academic and publishing field caused by the "four rationales" tendency, which is mainly characterized by "only SCI" and "only papers", directly threatens the survival and development of Chinese Sci-tech Journals in China. Based on the data survey of 16 provincial agricultural universities in China, it is found that there is no apparent difference between agricultural universities in terms of the number of scientific papers in Chinese journals included in China HowNet, and the total number of papers included is basically stable and changes between 18 262 and 18 683; While the number of papers included by foreign SCI differs greatly among agricultural colleges and universities, and there is a very significant positive correlation, and the total number of papers included in SCI increases exponentially year by year; With the rapid increase of the number of papers published in SCI source journals of universities, the number of papers published in Chinese journals has been basically stable, or even slightly decreased, which indicates that with the strengthening of the role of SCI as a baton in various evaluation systems, the number of Chinese Journal manuscript sources has been relatively reduced, and that the outflow of domestic high-quality papers is very serious. The alienated "SCI" not only deviates from the standard of academic communication of sci-tech journals, but also brings incalculable negative effects to the orderly and benign development of Chinese sci-tech journals. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
