| 钮凯福.同行评议中作者推荐审稿人作用的实证分析—以《数学进展》为例.编辑学报,2023,(3):295-298 |
| 同行评议中作者推荐审稿人作用的实证分析—以《数学进展》为例 |
| Case analysis for influence of authors’ recommended reviewers on peer review:a case study of Advances in Mathematics |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2023.03.011 |
| 中文关键词: 作者推荐 同行评议 审稿专家 送审策略 编委 |
| 英文关键词: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 53 |
| 全文下载次数: 254 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 对《数学进展》2016—2021年作者推荐审稿人在稿件同行评议流程中的作用进行数据统计与实证分析。发现在同行评议流程中已充分考虑选择作者推荐审稿人常见利弊的基础上,作者推荐审稿人参与审理的稿件录用率仍超过7成,且作者推荐审稿人更倾向于给出正面审理意见。结合编辑部工作实践分析了相应特殊数据的成因,并提出了协助作者推荐审稿人、控制“小同行抱团”稿件数量、送审与招募合适审稿人、避免作者博弈性推荐影响、支持编委发挥关键作用等对策。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Data related to influence of authors’ recommended reviewers attached in submissions of Advances in Mathematics from 2016 to 2021 are collected and studied. After taking serious consideration in popular positive and negative sides of selecting authors’ recommended reviewers during peer-review process, the acceptance rate of manuscripts reviewed by authors’ recommended reviewers is still over 70%, and the authors’ recommended reviewers are more inclined to provide positive review reports. Based on the practical work in the editorial office, the reasons for the somewhat peculiar data are analyzed, and some corresponding strategies are proposed, i.e., assisting authors to recommend reviewers, controlling the amount of manuscripts by certain small research groups, choosing and enrolling suitable reviewers, avoiding the authors’ gambling recommendations, and supporting members of Editorial Board to play a key role. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
