| 肖湘,贺嫁姿.高质量审稿意见的特点及刊登的现状与价值.编辑学报,2023,35(3):347-351 |
| 高质量审稿意见的特点及刊登的现状与价值 |
| Characteristics of high-quality review comments and the status and value of their publication |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2023.03.021 |
| 中文关键词: 高质量审稿意见 退修意见 退稿意见 审稿人 学术期刊 |
| 英文关键词: |
| 基金项目:*广东省高校学报研究会编辑学项目(20180305)；国家社科基金2021年度一般项目(21BXW085) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 107 |
| 全文下载次数: 590 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 高质量审稿意见不仅言之有据,对稿件全面客观评价,而且提出富有建设性的修改建议,具有很高的学术价值。从目前已刊发的情况看,高质量审稿意见按内容可分为珍贵史料型、学术争鸣型和学习借鉴型3种类型,按刊登载体模式可分为纸质刊物刊登型、纯网络版刊发型、审稿专家个人微信公众号推送型3种主要形式。选登高质量的审稿意见有利于培养稳定优秀审稿人队伍,有利于优质学术资源的共享与示范,有利于学术期刊的科研诚信建设。学术期刊可普及和推广高质量审稿意见选登,科研单位可将选登的高质量审稿意见纳入审稿人的工作业绩,全面推动学术期刊和科研工作的繁荣发展。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| High-quality review opinions not only provide well-founded and comprehensive objective evaluations of the manuscript, but also offer constructive suggestions for modification, which has high academic value. The classification of high-quality review comments can be divided into three types based on the content:precious historical data type, academic contention type, and learning reference type. Based on the publication carrier mode, it can be divided into three main forms:paper publication type, pure online publication type, and review expert personal WeChat official account push type. Selecting high-quality review opinions is beneficial for building and training an excellent team of reviewers, promoting the sharing and demonstration of high-quality academic resources, and promoting the integrity construction of academic journals. Academic journals can popularize and promote the selection of high-quality review opinions, while scientific research institutions can incorporate selected high-quality review comments into the work performance of reviewers, comprehensively promoting the prosperity and development of academic journals and scientific research. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
