文章摘要
张海燕.论文评审中的查重量化问题及改进路径.编辑学报,2023,(5):545-549
论文评审中的查重量化问题及改进路径
Problem and improvement of quantitative uses of results of duplicate checking in evaluating papers
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2023.05.016
中文关键词: 查重率  量化  功能定位  学术不端
英文关键词: duplicate inspection rate  quantitative  functional positioning  academic misconduct
基金项目:*温州市基础性科研项目软科学项目(R20180018);中国高校科技期刊研究会专项基金项目(CUJS2023-D02)
作者单位
张海燕 温州医科大学期刊社,325035,浙江温州 
摘要点击次数: 60
全文下载次数: 301
中文摘要:
      在论文写作、评审、修改等环节对其查重结果的量化应用主要表现为对查重率明确规定、硬性要求、过分强调及过度倚重。这些将学术不端审查简化为查重审查,将查重审查简化为查重率,将查重率转化为论文质量指标,进而异化为论文的常规指标进行约定、雕琢、打磨的做法不但将期刊和作者带入技术博弈的误区,也使期刊被查重率裹挟,陷入作茧自缚的困境,还影响作者对写作和学术不端的认知。对查重结果量化使用的主要原因是对查重的功能定位偏差和对学术不端的认识不足。解决这一问题,期刊需要回归学术不端审查的本意和理清学术不端的内涵,还需要学术评价体系中的各个环节对查重的理性认识。
英文摘要:
      Quantitative uses of results of duplicate checking in writing, evaluating and revising of papers are mainly manifested by clear regulations, rigid requirements, excessive emphasis, and excessive reliance on value of duplicate checking rate. By these practices, academic misconduct review was simplified as plagiarism review, which was simplified as into duplication checking rate further. And then duplication checking rate was transformed into an index of quality of papers, and alienated into conventional indicators of papers for agreement, carving, and polishing. Quantitative uses of results of duplicate checking will not only draw journals and authors into the misconception of technological gaming, but also lead journals to be trapped by themselves, and affect authors’ understanding of writing and academic misconducts. The main reasons for quantitative uses of duplicate checking are deviation in functional positioning of duplication checking and insufficient understanding of academic misconduct. To solve this problem, it is necessary to return to the original intention of academic misconduct investigation, clarify the connotation of academic misconduct, and rational understanding of all aspects of academic evaluation and evaluation in duplicate checking.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭