| 秦明阳,王超,邓履翔,陈灿华,杨华,赵俊,伍锦花.中国特色科技期刊评价体系的特征、探索与建议.编辑学报,2023,(6):598-604 |
| 中国特色科技期刊评价体系的特征、探索与建议 |
| Characteristics, exploration and suggestions of the evaluation system of scientific and technological journals with Chinese characteristics |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2023.06.002 |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 评价体系 中国特色 科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI) 分级目录 科技期刊预警名单 |
| 英文关键词: scientific and technological journals evaluation system Chinese characteristics World Journal Clout Index(WJCI) graded directory international journal warning list |
| 基金项目:*2023年度中国科技期刊卓越行动计划选育高水平办刊人才子项目——青年人才子项目(2023ZZ051919)；湖南省培育世界一流湘版科技期刊建设工程科技期刊杰出中青年人才项目(2021ZL9005,2021ZL9004,2021ZL9007);中国科技期刊卓越行动计划(卓越-C-194,卓越-C-193)；湖南省培育世界一流湘版科技期刊建设工程扶持重点期刊(2020ZL5014,2020ZL5012) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 45 |
| 全文下载次数: 289 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为了研究中国在科技期刊评价体系方面的改革和实践,首先分析了当前数据库主导的科技期刊评价体系特点,然后提出科技期刊评价“中国标准”的特征,并展示了近年来“中国特色”科技期刊评价体系的探索,最后提出未来科技期刊评价的发展建议。在传统的数据库主导的科技期刊评价体系中,学术共同体处于失语地位,中外科技期刊未被同质等效使用,且量化指标被过度推崇和人为操纵；中国特色科技期刊评价应由学术共同体参与制定,客观公正评价全球科技期刊并注重科技期刊的内容、特色与服务。近年来,科技期刊世界影响力指数(WJCI)、高质量科技期刊分级目录、科研单位/高校自主制定的“重要影响力期刊目录清单”以及科技期刊预警名单都为建立科技期刊评价“中国标准”做出了有益的探索,具有“高度自主”和“中国特色”的显著特征。未来需要坚持完善和更新各级评价体系,建立科技期刊评价体系互认和联动机制,并推广和应用科技期刊评价体系。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In order to study the reform and practice of China’s evaluation system of scientific and technological journals, firstly, the characteristics of the current evaluation system for scientific and technological journals were analyzed, which was governed by the database. Then, the characteristics of the “Chinese standard” for scientific and technological journal evaluation were proposed, and the exploration of the “Chinese characteristic” evaluation system for scientific and technological journals in recent years was presented. Finally, development suggestions for scientific and technological journal evaluation in the future were proposed. In the traditional evaluation system governed by database for scientific and technological journals, the academic community is in a state of aphasia, the “homogeneous and equivalent use” of domestic and foreign scientific and technological journals is hinderd, and the quantitative indicators are overly respected and artificially manipulated. The evaluation for scientific and technological journals with Chinese characteristics should involve the participation of academic communities, objectively and fairly evaluate global scientific and technological journals, and focus on the contents, characteristics, and services. In recent years, the World Journal Clout Index(WJCI) of Science and Technology Journals, the Graded Directory of high-quality science and technology journals, the “List of Important Influential Journals” independently developed by scientific research institutions/universities, and the “International Journal Warning List” have all made beneficial explorations for establishing the “China Standard” for the evaluation of science and technology journals. It is significantly characterized by “high degree of autonomy” and “Chinese characteristics”. In the future, it is necessary to adhere to perfecting and updating the evaluation system at all levels, establish a mutual recognition and linkage mechanism for the evaluation system of scientific and technological journals, and promote and apply the evaluation system of scientific and technological journals. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
