|
| 场域理论视角下同行评议公平信度提升路径研究 |
| The enhancement path of peer review fairness reliability from the perspective of field theory |
| 投稿时间：2023-12-09 修订日期：2024-05-29 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 场域理论 同行评议 科研诚信 |
| 英文关键词: field theory Peer review Scientific research integrity |
| 基金项目:中国药科大学高等药学教育科学规划重点课题“场域理论视角下的高校同行评议诚信建设研究”。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 11 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| [研究目的]梳理和总结同行评议模式中的非公平性行为,在科研诚信视阈下为国内学术期刊和项目审评同行评议发展提供借鉴和参考。[研究方法]借鉴场域理论“场域”“资本”和“惯习”三个核心视角分析同行评议主体背后的实践逻辑,系统分析其产生机理,并对提升路径的多维角度进行研究。[研究结论]场域理论背景下, 科研诚信视阈下同行评议公平信度缺失是场域关系危机、学术资本争夺、惯习形塑共同作用的结果。在此基础上,可以从建立场域良好的学术共同体合作关系、规避权力资源不当使用、改善形塑惯习的制度环境等方面对同行评议公平信度提升路径进行矫正与提升。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| [Objective] To sort out and summarize the unfair behaviors in peer review mode, and provide reference for the development of peer review in domestic academic journals and project reviews from the perspective of scientific research integrity. [Methods] The practical logic behind the peer review subject was analyzed from the three core perspectives of field theory, "field", "capital" and "habitus", and its mechanism was systematically analyzed, and the multi-dimensional perspective of the promotion path was studied. [Conclusion] In the context of field theory, the lack of peer review fairness reliability under the perspective of research integrity is the result of field relationship crisis, academic capital competition and habitus shaping. On this basis, we can correct and improve the path of peer review fairness reliability from the aspects of establishing a good academic community cooperation relationship, avoiding improper use of power resources, and improving the institutional environment of shaping habits. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
