| 林章碧,杨明娇,何其佳,张熙.省级期刊学(协)会设立编辑出版学基金项目及其成果分析与建议.编辑学报,2024,(2):144-148 |
| 省级期刊学(协)会设立编辑出版学基金项目及其成果分析与建议 |
| Analysis and suggestions of provincial publishing research fund established by provincial periodical association |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2024.02.006 |
| 中文关键词: 基金项目 省级期刊学(协)会 学术期刊 编辑学研究 编辑学论文 编辑人才培养 |
| 英文关键词: fund provincial periodical association academic periodical redactology study redactology paper editorial staff cultivation |
| 基金项目:*中国高校科技期刊研究会专项基金项目(CUJS2023-D36) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 27 |
| 全文下载次数: 233 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为了充分发挥省级期刊学(协)会在本地区学术期刊编辑成长和核心能力培养方面的推动作用,搜集我国31个省(自治区、直辖市)的期刊学(协)会对本地区学术期刊编辑出版学研究资助项目的成果论文和项目指南,采用文献计量学方法和文本分析法,分析各省级期刊学(协)会对编辑出版学研究的资助情况。针对地域差异和问题,提出切实可行的对策与建议。研究结果表明:14个省(自治区、直辖市)设立了省级期刊学(协)会编辑出版学资助基金,资助论文数量超过100篇的省(直辖市)按资助论文数量排序依次为:江苏、广东、浙江、重庆、上海、陕西；部分省级期刊学(协)会的基金资助存在设立不连续、管理欠规范且产出的论文数量少的问题；38.3%的受资助论文发表于核心期刊,项目成果质量有待进一步提高；独著论文占比较高,跨行政区的合作较少；科技期刊编辑、高校学术期刊编辑为资助的主要对象。对于未设立编辑出版学资助基金的省级期刊学(协)会,建议通过加大宣传、整合资源、采用新型资助模式设立项目基金等,充分调动各地区学术期刊编辑开展编辑出版学研究的积极性；对于已设立编辑出版学资助基金的省级期刊学(协)会,建议从项目申报前期、项目实施进程、项目验收结题3个阶段入手,进一步提高项目研究的质量。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| This study aims to sufficiently promote the development and core competence training of periodical editor by provincial periodical association.Through the paper and guideline of periodical redactology funded by provincial periodical associations of 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in China, the research funding of editing and publishing by provincial periodical associations was analyzed by bibliometric method and text analysis.Aiming at the regional differences and problems, practical countermeasures and suggestions were proposed.There were redactology funds of provincial periodical associations in 14 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities).The provinces (municipalities) which the number of funding papers exceeded 100 were arranged according to the paper quantity in following order:Jiangsu, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Chongqing, Shanghai, and Shaanxi.Some provincial periodical associations had discontinuous funds,abnormal management and small amount of produced papers.38.3% funding papers were published in core journals. The quality of research output needed to be further improved. The paper proportion of sole author was high. There was less cooperation across administrative regions. Periodical editors in universities and science and technology journal editors were the main objects of funding.For provincial periodical associations without redactology funds, the research enthusiasm of periodical editors should be activated by strengthening publicity, resource integration and new funding model. For provincial periodical associations establishing redactology funds, the research quality may be further improved from three stages, such as pre-declaration, implementation and acceptance. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
