| 刘晓艳.科技期刊选用作者推荐审稿人的分析与思考.编辑学报,2024,(3):300-302 |
| 科技期刊选用作者推荐审稿人的分析与思考 |
| Analysis and reflection on results of author-recommended reviewers |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2024.03.014 |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 作者推荐审稿人 同行评议 审稿专家 |
| 英文关键词: scientific journal reviewer recommended by author peer reviewer reviewers |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2 |
| 全文下载次数: 33 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 分析《河海大学学报(自然科学版)》115位推荐审稿人审稿结果发现,选用作者推荐审稿人可缩短审稿周期,但其容易给出过誉的审稿结论,造成稿件录用率虚高,延长稿件出版周期。为充分发挥推荐审稿人的作用,结合编辑部实际工作给出如下建议:制定详细推荐标准,引导作者正确、合理推荐审稿人；利用大数据、互联网等手段,合理选用推荐审稿人；将推荐审稿人列为约稿对象、精准向其推送相关论文,最大化发挥其作用；建立健全评价体系,提高审稿质量。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Based on analysis of the review results of 115 author-recommended reviewers in Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), it suggested that the selection of author-recommended reviewers can shorten the review cycle, but with a tendency for these reviewers to give overly favorable conclusion, resulting in an artificially high acceptance rate and prolonged publication cycle. In order to give full play to the role of author-recommended reviewers, the following suggestions are given based on the actual work of the editorial department:establish detailed recommendation criteria to guide authors in correctly and reasonably nominating reviewers; employ big data and the internet to make judicious selections of recommended reviewers; maximize the role of the recommended reviewers by listing them as solicitation targets and precisely pushing relevant papers to them; establish a sound evaluation system to improve the quality of review. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
