| 李睿奇,戚亮杰,朱娜,吴海西.缩短建筑科学期刊审稿周期的策略探讨.编辑学报,2024,36(6):617-621 |
| 缩短建筑科学期刊审稿周期的策略探讨 |
| Discussion on strategies to shorten the review cycle of architectural science journals |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2024.06.006 |
| 中文关键词: 建筑科学期刊 审稿周期 审稿人 同行评议 |
| 英文关键词: architectural science journals review cycle reviewers peer review |
| 基金项目:*中国高校科技期刊研究会专项基金(CUJS2023-D08)；西安建筑科技大学教学改革研究专项(JG23YB55)；学术诚信与版权专项基金(CUJSCX-2021-013) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 11 |
| 全文下载次数: 83 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 基于《西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)》历史审稿数据,为国内180种建筑科学期刊选择合适的审稿人,以缩短审稿周期,为提升办刊质量提供启示和借鉴。对该刊采编系统中2016—2023年的审稿数据进行量化分析,结合办刊实践,从期刊选取审稿人的角度分析审稿周期长的内在原因并提出破解思路。影响审稿周期的因素包括送审稿件数量、审稿人来源机构和审稿人年龄,造成审稿周期长的内在原因包括送审稿件数量和频率与审稿意愿不匹配、审稿人信息更新不及时、专家库结构单一、期刊与审稿人缺乏沟通。破解上述问题需要从编辑部的管理制度入手,设置审稿人梯度化管理和多元送审频率机制、增补青年审稿人优化队伍结构、多渠道遴选以增加审稿人组成多样性、建筑科学期刊集群共用审稿资源。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Based on the historical review data of the core journal Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Natural Science Edition), this paper provides inspiration and reference for selecting appropriate reviewers for 180 domestic architectural science journals to shorten the review cycle and improve the quality of journal publishing. The review data of the journal’s editing system from 2016 to 2023 were quantitatively analyzed. Combined with the practice of journal publishing, the internal reasons for the long review cycle were analyzed from the perspective of the journal selection of reviewers, and solutions were proposed. Factors affecting the review cycle include the number of manuscripts submitted for review, the source institution of the reviewers, and the age of the reviewers. The internal reasons for the long review cycle include the mismatch between the number and frequency of manuscripts submitted for review and the willingness to review, the untimely update of reviewer information, the single structure of the expert database, and the lack of communication between the journal and the reviewer. To solve the above problems, it is necessary to start with the management system of the editorial department, set up a gradient management mechanism for reviewers and a multiple review frequency mechanism, add young reviewers to optimize the team structure, select through multiple channels to increase the diversity of reviewers and promote the development of clustered review resource sharing of architectural science journals. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
