AIGC在学术研究和出版中的使用边界、透明度与伦理

谭春林; 王建平

文章摘要

谭春林,王建平.AIGC在学术研究和出版中的使用边界、透明度与伦理.编辑学报,2024,36(6):661-666

AIGC在学术研究和出版中的使用边界、透明度与伦理

Boundaries,transparency,and ethical of AIGC in academic research and publishing

DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2024.06.015

中文关键词: 生成式人工智能人工智能生成内容新质生产力学术出版使用边界学术伦理 AI辅助审稿数据泄露

英文关键词: generative artificial intelligence artificial intelligence generated content new quality productivity scholarly publishing usage boundaries academic ethics AI-assisted peer review data breach

基金项目:*广东省科技计划“高水平科技期刊建设项目”(2024B1212100006)；广东省科技计划项目科技期刊办刊人才项目(2024B1212110009)；中国科学技术期刊编辑学会2023-2024年度基金项目(cessp-2023-C06)；中国高校科技期刊研究会项目“善锋软件基金”(CUJS2023-SF004)

作者	单位
谭春林	华南师范大学期刊管理中心,《华南师范大学学报自然科学版》编辑部，510631，广州
王建平	华南师范大学期刊管理中心,《华南师范大学学报自然科学版》编辑部，510631，广州

摘要点击次数: 10

全文下载次数: 87

中文摘要:

在生成式人工智能(GenAI)时代,人工智能生成内容(AIGC)技术为学术研究、论文写作以及学术出版带来了颠覆性的变革,成为推动科技进步和社会发展的新质生产力。文章分析了AIGC大语言模型的3大应用场景(研究、出版、传播)；验证了AI辅助审稿的效果,讨论了AI辅助优化论文标题、

英文摘要:

In the era of generative artificial intelligence(GenAI), the technology of artificial intelligence generated content(AIGC) has brought about a ransformative change in academic research, paper writing, and scholarly publishing, becoming a “New Quality Productivity” driving technological progress and societal development. This paper analyzed the three major application scenarios of AIGC Large Language Models(research, publishing, dissemination), verifies the effectiveness of AI-assisted peer review and discusses the importance of AI-optimized paper titles, Keywords, and journal cover designs; explores the characteristics of AIGC Large Language Models being susceptible to guidance and suggestion, along with the potential risks of discrimination, bias, information leakage, and data breaches. Based on the “Guideline on the Boundaries of AIGC Usage in Academic Publishing” and the “Code of Conduct for Responsible Research Practices(2023)”, the boundaries and norms for the use of AIGC in academic publishing are summarized. The results indicate that AIGC can be used cautiously under specific conditions, with transparent disclosure and ethical statements. The academic community should continuously update the guidelines for usage boundaries, strengthen the regulation of ethical usage of AIGC, and provide more robust references for defining academic integrity and preventing academic misconduct.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭