|
| 我国生物医学期刊数据汇交与共享政策的FAIR化实施调研分析——以卓越行动计划一期入选期刊为例 |
| FAIRification elements of research data policy among biomedical journals in China: an investigation in journals funded by Excellence Action Plan for China’s STM Journals Phase One |
| 投稿时间：2024-11-20 修订日期：2025-02-14 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 数据政策 期刊 生物医学 卓越计划 FAIR |
| 英文关键词: research data policy biomedical journal Excellence Action Plan for China’s STM Journals FAIR |
| 基金项目:司法部司法鉴定重点实验室资助项目、上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台资助项目 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 6 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 本文对入选卓越计划一期的生物医学类期刊数据汇交和共享政策实施的现状和特点进行调研分析，为完善数据汇交机制、提升数据政策落实水平提供阶段性参考。采用卓越计划一期资助的生物医学类期刊为数据来源，根据科技期刊论文关联数据汇交和共享政策框架提取FAIR化实施要素9项，以期刊实施的数据政策文本为研究对象，对不同类别期刊数据政策的实施情况进行评价和统计分析。结果显示不同资助类型、语种、出版模式、传播平台的卓越计划一期入选生物医学期刊数据政策的实施表现在数据可发现性、可获取性和可重用性上差异显著，在互可操作性方面无统计学差异。我国生物医学期刊应在数据汇交和共享政策框架下制定和实施数据政策，在具体实践中应重视科学数据存储库、数据使用许可协议的推荐和说明，并通过数据政策实施来强化生物医学期刊的伦理义务的履行。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| This paper aims to present the implementation of research data policy in biomedical journals in China and to provide a specific perspective and reference for enhancing the implementation of research data policy framework. A sample of 91 biomedical journals funded by Excellence Action Plan was selected. The research data policy texts of the sample were examined and evaluated by using 9 FAIRification elements. It’s showed that significant differences existed across samples with different funding types, languages, access models and digital publishing platforms, in terms of data findability, accessibility and reusability. Data policy design and formulation facilitate the process of implementation of framework’s principles. Specific emphasis should be placed on recommending data repositories and data licences, which additionally is beneficial for adhering to ethical responsibilities for biomedical journals. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
