| 郭凤霞,胡长进,左萍,徐宽业.科技论文插图审读应关注“四性”.编辑学报,2025,37(1):42-47 |
| 科技论文插图审读应关注“四性” |
| Four characteristics to be concernedin reviewing illustrations in scientific and technical papers |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2025.01.009 |
| 中文关键词: 科技论文 插图 审读 |
| 英文关键词: scientific and technical paper illustration review |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 7 |
| 全文下载次数: 37 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 科技论文中插图的质量直接影响论文的学术质量,同时也影响科技期刊的出版质量。由于科技论文作者对插图的相关国家标准细则往往并不熟悉,所提供的初版插图常常存在诸多不规范之处,因此需要期刊编辑依照国家标准进行规范性编修。本文基于笔者的科技论文实际编校经验,结合前人的研究方法和技巧,依据科技论文插图应遵循的“四性”,即插图选用合理性、内容科学性、图文一致性、规范统一性,梳理了插图审读的逻辑顺序,总结出一般审读方法步骤,同时以实际编修的典型插图为例,分析了具体的审读方法以及针对性的编修策略,以期为编辑同人更加有条理、高效地处理插图提供参考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The quality of illustrations in scientific and technological papers directly affects the academic quality of the papers, as well as the publishing quality of scientific and technological journals. Because authors of scientific papers are often not familiar with the relevant national standards and regulations for illustrations, the initial illustrations provided often have many non-standard aspects.Therefore, journal editors need to standardize the illustrations according to the national standards. According to the “four properties” that illustrations in scientific papers should follow, namely rationality of selection, scientific content, consistency of graphics and text, and standardization and unity, the logical sequence of illustration review is sorted out, and the general review methods and steps are also summarized in this paper based on the authors’ practical experience in editing and proofreading scientific papers and combined with the previous research methods and skills.Furthermore, taking the typical illustrations edited in practice as examples, this paper analyzes the specific review methods and targeted editing strategies, to provide a reference for editors to deal with illustrations more orderly and efficiently. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
